User talk:Aleefazmir
Speedy deletion nomination of Alif Hilmi Azmir
A tag has been placed on Alif Hilmi Azmir, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GimliDotNet (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
March 2012
This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, as you did at Alif Hilmi Azmir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
To: user Boing! This is not an appropriate page. It really can't be understandable mentioning creating an inappropriate page.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)- The deletion discussion was at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Hilmi Azmir, and you were given a link. Wikipedia does not host articles about non-notable people - have a read of WP:GNG. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Aleefazmir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
this block are not necessary. The editing of a person's deletion page is not true. This page has been mistakenly deleted by someone who is unreliable. The block is no longer necessary because I've understand why I've been blocked for. Please unblock this back. And please with all your kind attention, please reconsider about this page, Alif Hilmi Azmir. There has been misunderstanding and mistakenly being deleted. Please read and make your full research about this page because this page has a strong citations and references compare to some other stub pages. Tq. alifazmir 09:32, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You clearly do not grasp why you have been blocked Jac16888 Talk 09:58, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- The article was deleted after community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alif Hilmi Azmir. You were given plenty of notifications, which you deleted (see history of this page). You did not take part in the deletion discussion, and you did not respond to this request to provide a source for the article. Instead you just repeatedly recreated it after it was deleted, and now you're arguing that the deletion was wrong. Now, firstly, if you wish to be unblocked, you need to convince a reviewing admin that you understand what happened and why the article was deleted, and that you will not create it again. And then, should you succeed in getting an unblock, you can request a review of the article's deletion at WP:DRV, but you *must not* simply keep recreating it. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:44, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Aleefazmir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The block is no longer necessary because I've understand why I've been blocked for. Please unblock this back. Now I have understand the steps and procedures that people can't just recreating repeatedly a page. This block is not necessary because I admit I didn't follow the guidelines and that's why this user warned me at first place. As I want this to be brief as well as u want it too, I shall not do the same mistake by recreating this page again but instead I'll follow the guidelines that you have stated. I won't do the same mistake again as I've understand the policy and the guidelines. Thank you for the guidelines feedback. With all your respect and kindness, I want to make an appeal to unblock back my status. Thank you.
Decline reason:
We don't get to promote ourselves on Wikipedia. Max Semenik (talk) 11:04, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Aleefazmir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm not promoting myself. I've followed the guidelines that the previous user had taught me. My request should at least be reconsider again. Before this I just don't know the guidelines and I admit that is my mistake. Now I know the ways of doing it the correct ways so of course I can promise you that it shall be my responsible to behave myself. Tq
Accept reason:
As you have agreed to stop recreating the article, I have unblocked you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
Under Wikipedia's policies (See WP:N to learn about notability requirements), you do not qualify for an article about yourself. Should you be unblocked you could dispute the deletion of it at WP:DRV, but I don't think you have any realistic chance of succeeding, because you simply don't come close to meeting the Wikipedia notability guidelines. So, my suggestion is that you forget about writing an article about yourself, and instead have a think about what other things you'd like to do here. If you can convince the next admin who reviews your request that you have positive things to contribute instead of battling about this one article, they might be prepared to unblock you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I meant actually. I'll contribute with any other sources. Actually this person is not me. I'm someone else from my state which I've been responsible to make a page for this person. Anyway just forget about it. So I'll be glad to give some other sources that is reliable because editing for reliable sources is my favorite as I am IT students. Please reconsider again my request. Tq.
- You don't need to put every comment in a new unblock request - you already have one open above. Anyway, you are now unblocked, as per my comment above. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:05, 29 March 2012 (UTC)