User talk:Akmalthegreat24

Hello, Akmalthegreat24, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Bheeshma Parvam did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Introduction tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Ab207 (talk) 09:25, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mamangam (2019 film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:06, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Naaradan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mako001 (C)  (T)  11:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bheeshma Parvam. - Arjayay (talk) 11:08, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Pathaan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 11:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Who is "Mohanlal"? Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place to edit war over what you think reviews, box office takes, etc., should be. Adakiko (talk) 11:37, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Bheeshma Parvam has been reverted.
Your edit here to Bheeshma Parvam was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://mobile.twitter.com/BOanalystteam/status/1499973128247668741) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 12:15, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at Talk:List of highest-grossing Indian films. Pavlov2 (talk) 06:38, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gdusb Akmalthegreat24 (talk) 12:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at List of Malayalam films of 2021.
Please stop adding unsourced + unreliably sourced claims - sources such as "Filmibeat"" are not acceptable, as explained at WP:ICTFSOURCES - Arjayay (talk)

Filmibeat sources has been taken in Wikipedia since a very long time I just wasn’t able To Do It correctly Just help me In making the cite we (Help) Situation. The Information That I Am Giving is accurate and I hope u Understand That And help Akmalthegreat24 (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. As repeatedly explained "Filmibeat"" is not an acceptable source as clearly listed at WP:ICTFSOURCES - Arjayay (talk) 19:21, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Encanto (film). - Arjayay (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:40, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Thani Oruvan. - Arjayay (talk) 13:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IF YOU CONTINUELY ADD UNSOURCED CONTENT, YOU WILL BE BLOCKED FOR LONGER! Pavlov2 (talk) 07:02, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 11:37, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Naaradan. - Arjayay (talk) 09:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Hey man im josh. I noticed that in this edit to New generation (Malayalam film movement), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:26, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Man I was removing these Said movies because they are not meant to be here. The movies I removed are terrible films and are not involved in the new wave of Malayalam Movies Akmalthegreat24 (talk) 17:28, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bheeshma Parvam, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. - Sneha996 (talk) 14:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kaashmora. - Arjayay (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kaashmora. - Arjayay (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]