User talk:AKATheBeast
Welcome!
Welcome...
Hello, AKATheBeast, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Zephyrnthesky (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello, I added the above template to this page to (belatedly) welcome you to the Wonderful World of Wikipedia. Having looked at your previous edits, it seems you have more than a passing interest in Will to Power. I edited that page a few months back with information I trusted was accurate from Billboard magazine. There are multiple charts on Billboard that deal with dance music, one of which is the Hot Dance Club Play chart. There is also a Hot Dance Airplay chart (relatively new) as well as a Hot Dance Singles Sales chart. What I said in the Will to Power article is that the group had two songs go to #1 on the Hot Dance Club Play chart, "Say It's Gonna Rain" in 1988 and "Fading Away" in 1989. That is accurate, and the link I added in that paragraph takes you to the List of #1s on the Club Play chart by artist, which is updated regularly and where Will to Power has a (2) next to it. I don't have a source to verify whether "Dreamin'" hit #1 on the dance sales chart, but I think you could probably add that as an "In addition"-type sentence to that paragraph. Or, if you'd like, I could do that for you, if one of us can get a Billboard source for it. But the 2 #1s on the Club Play chart is right. Hope that explains what I intended with my edit a while back. Let me know if there is anything else I can do. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 01:19, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Suzi Carr Modesto 2008.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Suzi Carr Modesto 2008.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Suzi Carr Modesto 2008.jpg
![File Copyright problem](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Suzi Carr Modesto 2008.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 10:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Suzi Carr Modesto 2008.jpg
![File Copyright problem](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/64px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
Thank you for uploading File:Suzi Carr Modesto 2008.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk)(review) 10:27, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Will to Power, May 2009
Hello, I've started a discussion thread on the talk page for Will to Power. Since you have contributed to the article, I would welcome any input you could provide as to ways we could work together to improve the article. Thanks. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 03:54, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello, AKATheBeast. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Zephyrnthesky (talk) 05:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Ok, I want to make this clear. Knock this stuff off right now. I shouldn't have to tell you what that's totally inappropriate but do not do that again. We have a very strict policy on how we describe living people and that applies to talk pages too, so no more attacks. Period. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 10:45, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
I have made an RVV because Zephyrnthesky has been vandalizing the page. On this Wikipedia page he has repeatedly vandalized the page and has removed documented information that has been up for 3 years and replaced it with slander and undocumented lies. I request that this page be locked down or deleted because his vandalism has made it worthless. I have not been on this page for awhile but was alerted about the vandalism. AKATheBeast (talk)
- Every edit Zephyrnthesky has made is well sourced. Please look at the references posted, and do not remove this material again. I also have provided extra sources on the talk page, but they were archived when ricky archived your attacks. Every penny of information zephyr has provided has been verified by other editors. If you vandalise this page again, I will refer you to an admin and have you blocked.Drew Smith What I've done 07:42, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
- It appears someone has beaten me to the punch...Drew Smith What I've done 07:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
Further to this (extended) thread at the Administrators' notice board and the prior warning you've had above, I've blocked your account from editing for one week to prevent further disruption on the Will to Power (band) article. Your issues with the article content are no excuse for edit-warring or making personal attacks on other editors. You may appeal this block by copy/pasting below this message the template {{unblock|your reason here}}, replacing 'your reason here' with your text. You may find it useful to read our guide to block appeals first. EyeSerenetalk 07:39, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/0c/Appointment_red.svg/48px-Appointment_red.svg.png)
AKATheBeast (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The information that was removed is more important than what was erroneous. Why were the letters from the biggest Radio Consultant, Bill Tanner removed? I may have gotten angry before but this time I clearly explained it. If the person in question "Collaborated" Dreamin', why was she not given writer's credit. Major information is the history of Will to Power not here say. I have not been on this site for months and was alerted that the article was totally changed. Many of the links lead to nothing. I supplied links and sites which were removed. I also requested that the page be deleted because of it's inconsistencies.
All of the new referenced are in a huge row at bottom instead of next to statement. Many do not lead to anything about Will to Power. What is up here now is not fact. What was deleted was.
Please inform me how an RVV is considered a disruptive edit? Was the explanation wrong? Please tell me the proper way to tell the truth.
A similar thing happened with Ashida Kim (Pen Name) a few years ago and Jimbo Wales held a second article for deletion. Ashida Kim (Pen Name) was slandered over and over. It took years to make it neutral. Much of this current article is here say and most of the interesting history is now gone.
The other person that made the edits since April is not neutral and has been attacking real living people by their real names. I read this appeal is supposed to be only about me and I did apologize for what had been said months ago on the discussion page but I was trying to prove the point that a Myspace page is not reliable proof.
Why aren't the sources places next to the statements? Why was such important information that has been up for over 3 years simply removed? Will to Power is one person who was signed to Epic and that one person is the producer, writer and vocalist of more than 3/4 the album and on the entire "Dreamin".
I feel the most fair thing is to delete this page totally and I request a vote. This looks like a never ending argument and the most simple thing would be to delete it.
Decline reason:
Your request to be unblocked is declined because it does not address the reason for your block or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince administrators either (a) that the block was made in error or (b) that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for and you will not repeat that behavior or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia again and you will make productive contributions instead. Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Toddst1 (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.