User talk:92.40.194.118

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Jones. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 14:08, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Tracy Kelly and this is my device and I don't want any other person using my phone or account 92.40.194.118 (talk) 07:16, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your IP generally isn't used exclusively by you; whoever's on it tends to change. Just because someone is using your IP address does not mean they've gotten access to your phone. (And since you don't have a Wikipedia account, your IP address is visible.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 07:46, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with the above. If you're on a mobile device, chances are very good that you share an IP with a few other people. I would not worry about that. Primefac (talk) 09:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Alfie Brown, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 13:52, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alfie Brown. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 13:54, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm LizardJr8. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Rose and Crown, Stoke Newington—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. LizardJr8 (talk) 22:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oh Hyeon-gyu. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NoNAja (talk) 22:13, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]