User talk:90.español

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to CSS Savannah (gunboat) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: CSS Savannah (gunboat) was changed by 90.español (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867827 on 2021-12-02T15:19:54+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on CSS Milledgeville requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://weaponsandwarfare.com/2021/05/16/css-milledgeville/ and https://books.google.com/books?id=ptdfDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA177&lpg=PA177&dq=This+one-of-a-kind+vessel+was+a+late-war+design+intended+to+be+an+improvement+over+the+earlier+standard+hull+types+such+as+the+Richmond+class.+As+such,+the+Milledgeville+had+a+similar+hull+structure+to+that+of+earlier+ironclads+but+incorporated+significant+design+changes.+Fortunately,+these+changes+are+shown+in+extant+plans+of+the+ironclad+bearing+Constructor+Porter%E2%80%99s+signature.+The+Milledgeville+was+a+twin-screw+standard+hull+ironclad+laid+down+in+February+1863+by+Henry+Willink,+the+constructor+of+CSS+Savannah+and+a+prominent+and+skilled+local+shipbuilder.+The+new+ironclad+was+175+feet+in+length+between+perpendiculars,+185+feet+in+overall+length,+35+feet+2+inches+in+molded+beam,+and+48.5+feet+in+extreme+beam.+It+featured+the+late-war+improvement+of+the+flush+deck+design+of+the+Columbia,+which+continued+to+flare+up+to+main+deck+level+instead+of+turning+back+at+the+waterline.+This+allowed+for+a+wider+main+deck+and+more+room+for+multiple+pivot+guns+in+the+shortened+casemate,+which+was+covered+with+6+inches+of+armor.+Most+important,+the+ship+had+a+reduced+draft+of+9+feet.+The+CSS+Milledgeville+plans+also+show+the+general+machinery+arrangement+of+the+ship,+although+its+final+configuration+may+have+differed+slightly.+Unfortunately,+like+those+of+most+other+Confederate+ironclads,+the+plans+show+little+actual+detail+of+the+engines+and+boilers.+Two+circles+scaled+to+approximately+30+inches+in+diameter+representing+single-cylinder+horizontal+engines+are+shown+in+the+starboard+plan+view+along+with+a+boiler+14+feet+long+and+6+feet+in+diameter.+Dimensions+taken+off+the+plans+show+that+the+Milledgeville+had+two+boilers.+Twin+propellers+7+feet+in+diameter+are+shown+at+the+stern.+All+the+machinery+was+built+by+Columbus+Naval+Iron+Works+and+should+have+given+good+service.+The+Milledgeville%E2%80%99s+completion+was+severely+delayed,+like+many+other+Confederate+ironclads.+Willink%E2%80%99s+prior+commitments+and+design+changes+to+the+ship+while+under+construction+were+the+biggest+factors.+The+Milledgeville+was+launched+in+the+early+fall+of+1864+and+was+nearly+complete+when+it+was+burned+to+prevent+capture+as+Union+forces+under+General+Sherman+reached+Savannah+on+December+21,+1864.+The+ship+was+anchored+and+ready+for+towing+out+of+harm%E2%80%99s+way,+but+there+were+no+vessels+available+to+help.+After+removing+some+stores+and+readying+the+hulk+for+maximum+destructive+effect,+the+Confederates+set+fire+to+the+ironclad;+it+was+soon+sunk.+The+Milledgeville%E2%80%99s+engines+and+most+of+its+armor+were+installed+by+that+time+but+were+salvaged+by+the+US+Army+Corps+of+Engineers+in+the+1890s.+The+current+condition+of+the+wreck+is+unknown%E2%80%94future+archaeological+surveys+of+the+site+may+uncover+new+details.&source=bl&ots=ACoi2pgLWJ&sig=ACfU3U3raKi1bz0NmZyuuUyfjV87sf5wMA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiIud2_pOj0AhVXlYkEHWtJCsMQ6AF6BAgREAM#v=onepage&q=This%20one-of-a-kind%20vessel%20was%20a%20late-war%20design%20intended%20to%20be%20an%20improvement%20over%20the%20earlier%20standard%20hull%20types%20such%20as%20the%20Richmond%20class.%20As%20such%2C%20the%20Milledgeville%20had%20a%20similar%20hull%20structure%20to%20that%20of%20earlier%20ironclads%20but%20incorporated%20significant%20design%20changes.%20Fortunately%2C%20these%20changes%20are%20shown%20in%20extant%20plans%20of%20the%20ironclad%20bearing%20Constructor%20Porter%E2%80%99s%20signature.%20The%20Milledgeville%20was%20a%20twin-screw%20standard%20hull%20ironclad%20laid%20down%20in%20February%201863%20by%20Henry%20Willink%2C%20the%20constructor%20of%20CSS%20Savannah%20and%20a%20prominent%20and%20skilled%20local%20shipbuilder.%20The%20new%20ironclad%20was%20175%20feet%20in%20length%20between%20perpendiculars%2C%20185%20feet%20in%20overall%20length%2C%2035%20feet%202%20inches%20in%20molded%20beam%2C%20and%2048.5%20feet%20in%20extreme%20beam.%20It%20featured%20the%20late-war%20improvement%20of%20the%20flush%20deck%20design%20of%20the%20Columbia%2C%20which%20continued%20to%20flare%20up%20to%20main%20deck%20level%20instead%20of%20turning%20back%20at%20the%20waterline.%20This%20allowed%20for%20a%20wider%20main%20deck%20and%20more%20room%20for%20multiple%20pivot%20guns%20in%20the%20shortened%20casemate%2C%20which%20was%20covered%20with%206%20inches%20of%20armor.%20Most%20important%2C%20the%20ship%20had%20a%20reduced%20draft%20of%209%20feet.%20The%20CSS%20Milledgeville%20plans%20also%20show%20the%20general%20machinery%20arrangement%20of%20the%20ship%2C%20although%20its%20final%20configuration%20may%20have%20differed%20slightly.%20Unfortunately%2C%20like%20those%20of%20most%20other%20Confederate%20ironclads%2C%20the%20plans%20show%20little%20actual%20detail%20of%20the%20engines%20and%20boilers.%20Two%20circles%20scaled%20to%20approximately%2030%20inches%20in%20diameter%20representing%20single-cylinder%20horizontal%20engines%20are%20shown%20in%20the%20starboard%20plan%20view%20along%20with%20a%20boiler%2014%20feet%20long%20and%206%20feet%20in%20diameter.%20Dimensions%20taken%20off%20the%20plans%20show%20that%20the%20Milledgeville%20had%20two%20boilers.%20Twin%20propellers%207%20feet%20in%20diameter%20are%20shown%20at%20the%20stern.%20All%20the%20machinery%20was%20built%20by%20Columbus%20Naval%20Iron%20Works%20and%20should%20have%20given%20good%20service.%20The%20Milledgeville%E2%80%99s%20completion%20was%20severely%20delayed%2C%20like%20many%20other%20Confederate%20ironclads.%20Willink%E2%80%99s%20prior%20commitments%20and%20design%20changes%20to%20the%20ship%20while%20under%20construction%20were%20the%20biggest%20factors.%20The%20Milledgeville%20was%20launched%20in%20the%20early%20fall%20of%201864%20and%20was%20nearly%20complete%20when%20it%20was%20burned%20to%20prevent%20capture%20as%20Union%20forces%20under%20General%20Sherman%20reached%20Savannah%20on%20December%2021%2C%201864.%20The%20ship%20was%20anchored%20and%20ready%20for%20towing%20out%20of%20harm%E2%80%99s%20way%2C%20but%20there%20were%20no%20vessels%20available%20to%20help.%20After%20removing%20some%20stores%20and%20readying%20the%20hulk%20for%20maximum%20destructive%20effect%2C%20the%20Confederates%20set%20fire%20to%20the%20ironclad%3B%20it%20was%20soon%20sunk.%20The%20Milledgeville%E2%80%99s%20engines%20and%20most%20of%20its%20armor%20were%20installed%20by%20that%20time%20but%20were%20salvaged%20by%20the%20US%20Army%20Corps%20of%20Engineers%20in%20the%201890s.%20The%20current%20condition%20of%20the%20wreck%20is%20unknown%E2%80%94future%20archaeological%20surveys%20of%20the%20site%20may%20uncover%20new%20details.&f=false. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mvqr (talk) 12:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Annie Kingdom. I noticed that you recently removed content from CSS Morgan without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Annie Kingdom (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, República (torpedo boat), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Hary1mo per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hary1mo. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  firefly ( t · c ) 17:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 90.español. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:República (torpedo boat), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 90.español. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "República".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]