User talk:8loquaris

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Inverse dynamics, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Inverse dynamics is *NOT* just robots, nor was it exclusively solved by that one dude. Mokele (talk) 14:14, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Mokele, thank you for your comment. Although I do understand your worry about the addition we made to your inverse dynamics article, our intention was not to distort any of that information only to include information for all those wiki fans wanting to learn more about inverse dynamics and its problem. I am sorry to disappoint you, but THE solution to the problem of inverse dynamics WAS solved by Dr. Eduardo Bayo, an accomplished dynamicist (PhD.,UC Berkeley, Structural Engineering,1982) in 1987 while a professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara. Although it is very true that this discovery does not only effect Robotics, it is in the field of Robotics that this theory was tested and verified. The problem of inverse dynamics had been an issue baffling scientists for years. Since its discovery in 1987 and subsequent publishing in the "Journal of Robotic Systems", a paper which received the BEST PAPER award from ASME after that, Dr. Bayo’s dynamics ideas have been used in other areas where dynamics is seen such as specifically in VTOL aircraft control, temperature tracking in hypothermia patients, iterative learning control, tracking PID control, atomic force microscopes, position stages and chemical reactor controls to name a few. The key element of his innovation is the simultaneous treatment of nonlinearity and nonminimum phase zeros. So, with this said, where would you prefer we add this information? --8loquaris (talk) 17:49, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, it's not "the" solution - there are *plenty* of inverse dynamics problems that are sufficiently simple that they don't require incorporation of "nonlinearity and nonminimum phase zeros", whatever those are. Hell, I can solve for joint torques and muscular moments on the back of a napkin. Maybe this paper is hot shit in engineering, but those of us in biomechanis have no real need of it. I've got references dating 20 years before this paper solving inverse dynamics problems is a simple and straightforward manner.

The information you want to add should be in the body of the article, *not* in the introduction (in part because the introduction is supposed to be, well, introductory), and should be less promotional-sounding. Focus on what it solved and why it's important, not awards or praise. And tone it down, none of this "THE" solution crap. Mokele (talk) 03:05, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Eduardo Bayo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. UtherSRG (talk) 09:56, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eduardo Bayo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

First of all, the text is written more like a resume than an encyclopedia article. Second, there are no references at all in the article. I would've used PRODBLP but there is a link where his name is shown. Third, a google search brought up only one secondary sources about the subject. I don't think he's notable, and even if he is, I feel this page should still be deleted to insure compliance with the BLP policy.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. funplussmart (talk) 02:44, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]