User talk:43.247.66.161

Hello! I noticed your contributions to RiverFire and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to add edit summaries when making a change to an article. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RTao. I noticed that you recently removed content from Welsh place names in other countries without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. RTao (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Locations in Australia with a Welsh name. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   23:06, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at World's Strongest Man, you may be blocked from editing. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 06:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Snapper Rocks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 04:32, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your recent edit to List of electric bicycle brands and manufacturers appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fuzheado. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bowls New Zealand—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Fuzheado | Talk 04:35, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Canberra Raiders Women, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. In the future, I'd also recommend not using bare urls and using template:cite web when adding sources in the future. Happy editing! ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 04:42, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've reverted your edits to Lucas' Papaw Ointment, as this content is not necessary on a redirect. — Moriwen (talk) 22:59, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Pharmacare Laboratories. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft of your article in draftspace or in your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Pharmacare Laboratories is currently a redirect page. Please create a draft, make sure that it adheres to relevant standards, such as Wikipedia's notability and reliable source guidelines, and then submit the draft for review once it is ready for publication. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:11, 10 October 2023 (UTC) [reply]

Please note that disambiguation pages like [[:]] are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 22:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add cats that already include categories that are listed. For example, in List of electric bicycle brands and manufacturers Category:Lists of manufacturers already includes Category:Cycle manufacturers. Meters (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Scully Park, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. -Lemonaka 07:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Again, please stop adding redundant categories. Meters (talk) 19:27, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia, and articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits, as you did to Hammersmith. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, please use the sandbox instead, where you are given a certain degree of freedom in what you write. Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:43, 20 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
• reliable
• secondary
• strictly independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Grange Golf Club and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 23:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, 43.247.66.161! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 23:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop messing around with categories. Don't add categories that are apparently unconnected to articles, and don't claim that non-existent articles are the main articels for a category. You have done this on multiple articles Meters (talk) 23:27, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Hoyts. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 21:57, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 01:03, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to National Trust of Australia (Victoria)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 06:12, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Royal Darwin Hospital. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop adding or changing existing wikilinks to targets that do not exist! Dfadden (talk) 12:11, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at HOH Twitch Television Championship, you may be blocked from editing. Don't add non-existent categories Meters (talk) 21:20, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Bump to final. You have added nonexistent cats or pointless cats to multiple articles. This is the same typo of behaviour that got you blocked. Stop. Meters (talk) 21:26, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 21:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.