User talk:31.205.8.101

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Azazul Haque, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 02:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mohammad Shahabuddin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. XYZt (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Mohammad Shahabuddin. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please also do not add unverified sentences to Wikipedia, such as "Siwan doctors were asked to not to take more than 50 rupees from poor for medical consultant fee." Without providing a source, it is hard for others to tell if the claim is credible or not. Also, please avoid the use of phrases like "one of the best..." as they are your personal opinion and are not suitable for an encyclopedia. XYZt (talk) 06:10, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia. I reverted your edits in Mohammad Shahabuddin because they violated several of Wikipedia's guidelines. Mainly:

• Not adhering to Neutral Point of View policies

You are adding qualifiers such as "one of the best" and "one of the most powerful". These phrases cannot be proven true nor false and thus are not fit for an encyclopedia.

• Citing sources that don't prove your claims

You've cited this article. But you are failing to differentiate between an author's opinion and an article's facts. You've also added the claim that the person in question took action to make all campuses safe for girls, phrased in a way as to appear that the person in question is some sort of great hero. Yet you failed to provide the source for the claim.

• Poor formatting and grammar

Your edits have a dozen or so grammar errors that need to be fixed as they are distracting for some readers.

All in all, those were the reasons I reverted your edits. Please explain your side of the situation so I can better understand the reasons why you keep on reverting my reverts. XYZt (talk) 07:23, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. XYZt (talk) 07:55, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]