User talk:218.186.9.5/archive1

Thank you for experimenting with the page Steve Jobs on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 05:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 08:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have been experimenting by your latest edit but this was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more. Please note that continued unhelpful edits may even result in your account being blocked. Thanks. Glen 09:21, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- — xaosflux ^Talk 02:11, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anything wrong with asking somebody to semi-protect a page because you think the vandals will attack the page? Especially if the page is where you report vandals? (this unsigned comment was left by 218.186.9.5 at 04:02, 27 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

You should request semi-protection at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, if you believe it is warranted. Mishatx 04:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me that. This place is confusing. I guessed I asked at the wrong place. I wasn't trying to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point like the other person said. You're the only nice person here, not like the other people who like to block me. So much for trying to help. I can't request there when blocked, so I guess I have to wait for my block to be over, and then request. Or you can help me request. I happened to stumble on that page while random browsing, and it should be semi-protected, otherwise vandals can remove their reports. And I know what semi-protection is because my favourite article was semi-protected because of vandalism, not by me, of course. (this unsigned comment was left by 218.186.9.5 at 04:22, 27 October 2006 (UTC))[reply]

I'll let you make the request (tomorrow, I suppose) since I don't feel strongly about sprotecting that page.

I'll leave a welcome message below with some links to help you out once you get unblocked. I know Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first. Mishatx 04:36, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I went to the link you gave me and asked them to semi-protect the page where you report vandals. I hope they give me an answer quickly.

Have removed names. If you want to promote the names of gay activists/etc please do it elsewhere. Personal websites exist for a reason.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

218.186.9.5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

i do not understand why am i been blocked. I have never been editing anything in wikipedia until just recent i found i was blocked when i wanted to edit an article.

Decline reason:

You very probably haven't done anything, but unfortunately someone else with access to this IP address *has* done something -- it's been used repeatedly for vandalism, and it's unfortunate that we've had to block it from editing to protect Wikipedia and save other editors time in cleaning up after those who have nothing better to do than vandalize. Now, I do have some good news; if you're able to register an account from another IP address (school, local library, friend's house, wherever), you'll be able to edit once you log in, because this block is "anon-only." Hope that makes sense. Sorry for the trouble. -- Luna Santin 21:43, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent edit to Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 04:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove content from a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gdo01 04:05, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

31 hoursYou have been temporarily blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I think you should read this if you don't want to get blocked again. Wikipedia:Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Gdo01 04:08, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Singlish (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 18:34, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Homosexuality in Singapore. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 02:49, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Homosexuality in Singapore. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 02:57, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 12:34, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Napoleon Dynamite. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 19:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 12:15, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. MER-C 12:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Professional wrestling aerial techniques on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 21:28, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canadian-Bacon ^{t c} 21:43, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Ang Mo. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Jayden54 16:00, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dakota 01:29, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. SkierRMH 01:36, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. SkierRMH 01:37, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 14th Lok Sabha. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. amitch 10:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to 14th Lok Sabha. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. codetiger 10:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Stephanie McMahon on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. amitch 13:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Indo-Pakistani War of 1947 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 12:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. MER-C 12:30, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from India. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — Lost^(talk) 11:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. — Lost^(talk) 11:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Boise, Idaho (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 11:15, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Canopic jar (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. WHeimbigner 06:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 12:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to United Airlines Flight 826, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- AirOdyssey (Talk) 01:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Public sphere. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tony Fox (arf!) 08:44, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]