User talk:213.86.30.73

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to United States anti-abortion movement, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 11:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Favonian (talk) 11:41, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Racist edits like this will be given no tolerance. Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 13:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Secular Pro-Life ‎, you may be blocked from editing. This is your second attempt to delete content without explanation from this page. Combined with your previous warning, you need to be aware that your IP is in danger of being blocked from further editing if you continue in this way. PlLease see WP:3RR Nick Moyes (talk) 12:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:213.86.30.73 reported by User:Slightlymad (Result: ). Thank you. Slightlymad (talk ⋅ contribs) 03:58, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Secular Pro-Life. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:12, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on FactCheck.org. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — Newslinger talk 16:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.