User talk:213.205.200.125

Hi, 213.205.200.125,

I see you have censored/edited the Ichikawa article leaving these comments:

- I have deleted the total lies which were entered. Ohutska was banned from the dojo and tiani has no credible evidence of being a member of the dojo. When I get the confirmation of Ichikawa's notable students I will publish them in consultation n with his students. - Other true students will follow.

I see that you make very strong and passionate accusations with your choice of words, as a seeker of the truth, I must ask, what are your sources and basis to argument the latter? Of course, what we all want is for this article to be as close as possible to the reality of the events, and an objective transcription of the history. I am not defending anyone, but a question arises from your edit from your comment on "Ohutska was banned from the dojo", one thing is being banned, another to have been a student of Ichikawa, wouldn't you agree?

Please answer objectively, this is not about passion, this is about seeking the truth and adjusting this article to match the facts.

TraditionalKarate (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Andre Marriner have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:01, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Mvqr. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dunkirk evacuation have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Mvqr (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dunkirk evacuation. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 10:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Whiteboard, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 10:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. DBaK (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism, as done at Hummingbird.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marling School. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SovalValtos (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]