User talk:204.13.205.35

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
This shared IP address has received multiple warnings for inappropriate edits. Since different users may be using this IP address, many of these warnings may be stale. Click [show] at far right to see all previous warnings and/or blocks.
The following is a record of previous warnings and/or blocks left for this IP. Please do not modify it.

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Pennsylvania has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. 1exec1 (talk) 18:28, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at First Barbary War, you may be blocked from editing. See this diff. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 19:18, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits; the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Plough, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you! -- VictorianMutant(Talk) 16:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 18:48, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Marple Newtown School District has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 17:21, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wang Shichong. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JodyB talk 18:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gelsen Gas, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Greco-Persian Wars, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot NG.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Achaemenid Empire. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:51, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Reptile, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Marple Newtown School District, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talkcontribs) 15:21, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Dylan (name), please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (talk) 16:30, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pajama Sam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Pajama Sam. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. EWikistTalk 18:09, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Pajama Sam. EWikistTalk 18:11, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Baseball at the Summer Olympics, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talkcontribs) 20:43, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Elissa Steamer with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Logan Talk Contributions 23:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Greek American, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Taiwan independence, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Cawley. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22.  </ref>

== References ==
{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers[1], which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 14:02, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page William Cawley worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:07, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at William Cawley. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lamb of God, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Lamb of God was changed by 204.13.205.35 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964421 on 2011-05-25T14:38:08+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:38, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Cawley. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! France3470 (talk) 21:30, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Elsa Pataky, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. AKS (talk) 13:56, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Carlos Zambrano. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rails (talk) 18:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Construction of Mount Rushmore with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 18:42, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mount Rushmore, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Glacialfox (talk) 18:43, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Educational institution IP address
To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Vsmith (talk) 15:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Cawley, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:56, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission William Cawley

Hello 204.13.205.35. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled William Cawley.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Cawley}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:03, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Information icon Hello, I'm Jim1138. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Macbeth, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 18:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to B.o.B., without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yintan  13:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Thompson.matthew. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 12:44, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Matthew Thompson talk to me bro! 12:49, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Philadelphia Flyers, you may be blocked from editing. Echoedmyron (talk) 13:25, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Herman Melville, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jeffrd10 (talk) 13:53, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2015

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cronus. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 12:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Chicken, you may be blocked from editing. Plantsurfer 12:27, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dan Schneider (TV producer). Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 15:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2015 (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! 204.13.205.35, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. samtar {t} 20:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Treaty of Paris (1783)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 18:22, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wildlife biologist. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 19:11, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Cheese puffs. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Woodlot (talk) 19:19, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Your edit at Bobby Wood was reverted because of vandalism. GameEnd (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Snood1205. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of career achievements by Magic Johnson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. snood1205(Say Hi! (talk)) 17:31, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of career achievements by Magic Johnson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. -- DaxServer (talk) 17:32, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021

Information icon Hello, I'm Aeschylus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Localhost—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. aeschylus (talk) 18:41, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Localhost. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. aeschylus (talk) 18:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]