User talk:198.179.4.254

Welcome! Last edited: Last edited by: 19:42, 11 March 2023 (UTC) Legobot (talk · contribs) Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your IP address, 198.179.4.254, is registered to Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and may be shared by multiple users of a government agency or facility, so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation. In the event of vandalism from this IP address, anonymous editing may be disabled. If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that it may be possible for your agency or facility's administration to determine who was making contributions from this address at any given time and abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for further investigation. Some government IP addresses are considered sensitive. If blocking this IP address, determine if Wikipedia:SIP applies; if so, follow directions. Officials and network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Iceberg Slim has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Iceberg Slim was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964091 on 2014-08-04T18:14:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Babitaarora. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Éminence grise without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Babita arora 12:15, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Malcolm Shabazz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Chamith (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:08, 19 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Amin has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Amin was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970994 on 2015-02-24T21:25:44+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:25, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Elizabeth Montgomery has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Elizabeth Montgomery was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.851876 on 2015-04-30T14:12:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Graham Greene article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! DemocraticLuntz (talk) 17:10, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Afroman. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 18:24, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Wild (film), you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 18:25, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at The Weavers, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sundayclose (talk) 19:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Lynne Frederick— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~ ^{(talk) (contribs)} 19:45, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Frances Newton article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! JustBerry (talk) 22:06, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Jesse Eisenberg, you may be blocked from editing. 216.125.48.227 (talk) 14:27, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Brown Dog affair has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 17:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Twelve-step program. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --allthefoxes ^(Talk) 22:32, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Civil Rights Act of 1964. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. bojo | talk | contribs 14:27, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Kitty O'Brien Joyner seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Flesh-n-Bone. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 17:57, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Legend of Bagger Vance has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Legend of Bagger Vance was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855178 on 2019-10-18T17:48:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Val Kilmer has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Val Kilmer was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.937502 on 2019-12-16T16:10:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:10, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gone with the Wind (film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gone with the Wind (film), you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Gone with the Wind (film) was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953958 on 2019-12-16T16:24:51+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:24, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to The Donna Reed Show has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: The Donna Reed Show was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.970461 on 2020-05-08T19:20:10+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:20, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Herman Perry has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Herman Perry was changed by 198.179.4.254 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.94139 on 2020-05-27T22:18:22+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:18, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Diane di Prima—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Asartea. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bryant Gumbel—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. -- Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 13:33, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]