User talk:142.160.253.65

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Leroy & Stitch. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The sentence read as follows (emphasis added): "It is the third and final sequel film of the 2002 animated feature film Lilo & Stitch[...]" Replacing "third" with "fourth" made it sound like there is another animated sequel feature film that we don't know about. And actually, expanding on my edit summary, not only would "sequel" have to be removed from the sentence, but "of the original [...] Lilo & Stitch" would also need to be rewritten to emphasize the franchise instead, and the following sentence already mentions the franchise. ("It also concluded the main continuity of the Lilo & Stitch franchise where Lilo Pelekai is a main character and Hawaii is the main setting.") –WPA (talk) 07:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Leroy & Stitch, you may be blocked from editing. There was no need to complicate things there. It's either "fourth film" or "third sequel film". Lilo & Stitch (2002) had three sequel feature films, which made Leroy & Stitch the fourth film in the franchise. Also, the slash needlessly complicated the sentence and made it incorrect. Actually, I do see that you were trying to incorporate The Series (or possibly The Origin of Stitch short film) because of that, but that still isn't acceptable; it still complicates things for readers and the show is already mentioned in the sentence anyway (and TOoS, which is again a short film, is not important enough to need a mention). Just leave it to just the feature-length films. –WPA (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Leroy & Stitch. –WPA (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Leroy & Stitch) for a period of 1 week for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Izno (talk) 20:35, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]