Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page James A. Johnson (architect) have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Blessed Martyrs of Drina. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
Your recent editing history at 1943 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Gar (talk) 02:40, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at 1943, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gar (talk) 18:55, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1942, you may be blocked from editing. Garchomp2017 (talk) 21:58, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 1942. Gar (talk) 09:58, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 1946. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Gar (talk) 15:27, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at 1942. Gar (talk) 03:28, 23 April 2017 (UTC)