User talk:116.74.22.165

I love history, but not the propaganda where you put most unrelated and irrelevant thing right next to sensitive topic, stick to reddit lil bro if you really want to write some non-sense while being unrelated to this topic. Nexusx25 (talk) 16:41, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ātman (Hinduism). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:50, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't unconstructive edit, there is no proof of what was written there except a dictionary which made the random claim but no proof of it, there are different words for breathing is called Svasa or Prana for life/breathing in Sanskrit so how can a word Atman completely unrelated to breathing would be related to the words that mean breathing in different language? All I did was remove it because writing that there doesn't actually make any sense at all, nor expect it to when it is being edited by someone who absolutely have no knowledge of the topic, except for pursuing certain interest. Nexusx25 (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can stop with making claims about my knowledge or lack thereof. You know nothing about me. Please read WP:CIVIL. Second, your change is contested. Please provide a reliable, secondary source. The extant text has a source. Thus, if you disagree, you need to be able to back it up with sources...not just you saying it's wrong. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 18:06, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mr Snowflake, I was referring to the person who wrote that not you, dumbass, why do I need to provide proof for something that is written there with no proof? Hell, I removed it because it had no real proof, perhaps it's you who needs to reread that CIVIL thing cuz you blocked me because you got butthurt over assumptions you made yourself. Lastly before asking me for proof check the source of what of what is written yourself, no wonder no one relies on wiki anymore.

"You can stop with making claims about my knowledge or lack thereof. You know nothing about me" Seriously? You obviously isn't even a Hindu how would you have knowledge of our language or our religion? Anyways as I said earlier, I was referring to the other person who kept changing it again and again. Nexusx25 (talk) 18:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When you have something constructive to say, I'll be listening. In the meantime, I've placed a final warning regarding your behavior on your talk page. I suggest you heed the warning. --Hammersoft (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for disruptive editing. The place to discuss a contested edit is on that article talk page (Talk:Ātman (Hinduism)). Reflexively edit warring is not the way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  El_C 18:01, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]