User talk:श्रीमान २००२/Archives/2020/August

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
670		Citizenship Amendment Act protests (talk)	Add sources
10		Hilsa, Nepal (talk)	Add sources
184		East Delhi (talk)	Add sources
38		Udal of Mahoba (talk)	Add sources
22		Amrohi Syed (talk)	Add sources
6		Okhla Vihar (talk)	Add sources
278		Radia tapes controversy (talk)	Cleanup
133		Sino-Nepalese War (talk)	Cleanup
192		Tamil Maanila Congress (talk)	Cleanup
831		Shantaram (novel) (talk)	Expand
2,614		Article 370 of the Constitution of India (talk)	Expand
875		Minister of Education (India) (talk)	Expand
50		Greater Kashmir (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
480		Sangh Parivar (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
952		Kshatriya (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
33		Stone pelting in Kashmir (talk)	Merge
106		State units of the Bharatiya Janata Party (talk)	Merge
1,978		Maruti Suzuki (talk)	Merge
17		K. N. Dandayudhapani Pillai (talk)	Wikify
104		Community mobilization (talk)	Wikify
6,766		Amit Shah (talk)	Wikify
17		Ready To Wait campaign (talk)	Orphan
3		NDTV Arabia (talk)	Orphan
16		CBSE expression series (talk)	Orphan
12		Rasuwa Fort (talk)	Stub
20		Banaphar (talk)	Stub
8		Tejaswini Singh (talk)	Stub
82		All India Mahila Congress (talk)	Stub
10		Modern Vidya Niketan schools (talk)	Stub
6		Dehradun Literature Festival (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Sapna Chowdhary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Ktin (talk) 06:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Hello, I'm SerChevalerie. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Stone pelting in India have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. This edit brought in blatant violations of WP:BLP. So did some of your other edits at Tahir Hussain (politician). SerChevalerie (talk) 13:15, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, you may be blocked from editing. Rhode Island Red (talk) 15:31, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

@Rhode Island Red: Kindly see this section the talk page of the concerned article.--User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 05:22, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You're repeating the same behaviour everywhere, assuming that a media report is true when it is NOT PROVED IN COURT. SerChevalerie (talk) 11:33, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi श्रीमान २००२! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Are opinion pieces from journalists of 'deprecated outlet' banned ?, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

There is a discussion concerning you at WP:ARE. SerChevalerie (talk) 16:27, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

Can you please leave a statement to this request at WP:AE? --Guerillero | Parlez Moi 13:14, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi श्रीमान २००२! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Are sources published by parent organisation considered reliable, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

The following topic ban now applies to you:

You are indefinitely banned from editing all pages and discussion connected with India, Pakistan, or Afghanistan.

You have been sanctioned for persistent insertion of original research, use of unreliable sources or no sources at all, and tendentious editing.

This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with the topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period to enforce the ban.

If you wish to appeal the ban, please read the appeals process. Doug Weller talk 10:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

You've violated the ban. You can get a pass on that one, don't do it again. Doug Weller talk 15:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

@Doug Weller: Sorry, I was unaware that I was banned--User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 10:12, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

That's ok, I suspected as much. Doug Weller talk 10:39, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi, regarding your proposed deletion of Goan sausage [1], with the explanation: Is not notable enough to have an article, most of the contents are unsourced. The proposal has been removed. Please note that before nominating or proposing a page for deletion, if the concern is notability, editors are expected to make a reasonable effort to find sources, at minimum a web search, as explained in WP:BEFORE. Also, lack of citations is not in itself grounds for deletion, if the information is in fact verifiable. Again, a basic web search is expected. I was able to easily find numerous reliable published sources giving significant and in-depth coverage of the subject. There is clearly no reason for this article to be deleted. Please try to be more careful in the future about confirming whether a subject meets verifiability requirements, before adding a proposed deletion template, thanks. --IamNotU (talk) 18:08, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

OK. Noted.--User:श्रीमान २००२ (User talk:श्रीमान २००२) 04:16, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi श्रीमान २००२! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Templates in other language, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this newsletter

The Reply tool has been available as a Beta Feature at the Arabic, Dutch, French and Hungarian Wikipedias since 31 March 2020. The first analysis showed positive results.

• More than 300 editors used the Reply tool at these four Wikipedias. They posted more than 7,400 replies during the study period.
• Of the people who posted a comment with the Reply tool, about 70% of them used the tool multiple times. About 60% of them used it on multiple days.
• Comments from Wikipedia editors are positive. One said, أعتقد أن الأداة تقدم فائدة ملحوظة؛ فهي تختصر الوقت لتقديم رد بدلًا من التنقل بالفأرة إلى وصلة تعديل القسم أو الصفحة، التي تكون بعيدة عن التعليق الأخير في الغالب، ويصل المساهم لصندوق التعديل بسرعة باستخدام الأداة. ("I think the tool has a significant impact; it saves time to reply while the classic way is to move with a mouse to the Edit link to edit the section or the page which is generally far away from the comment. And the user reaches to the edit box so quickly to use the Reply tool.")[2]

The Editing team released the Reply tool as a Beta Feature at eight other Wikipedias in early August. Those Wikipedias are in the Chinese, Czech, Georgian, Serbian, Sorani Kurdish, Swedish, Catalan, and Korean languages. If you would like to use the Reply tool at your wiki, please tell User talk:Whatamidoing (WMF).

The Reply tool is still in active development. Per request from the Dutch Wikipedia and other editors, you will be able to customize the edit summary. (The default edit summary is "Reply".) A "ping" feature is available in the Reply tool's visual editing mode. This feature searches for usernames. Per request from the Arabic Wikipedia, each wiki will be able to set its own preferred symbol for pinging editors. Per request from editors at the Japanese and Hungarian Wikipedias, each wiki can define a preferred signature prefix in the page MediaWiki:Discussiontools-signature-prefix. For example, some languages omit spaces before signatures. Other communities want to add a dash or a non-breaking space.

• The new requirements for custom user signatures began on 6 July 2020. If you try to create a custom signature that does not meet the requirements, you will get an error message.
• Existing custom signatures that do not meet the new requirements will be unaffected temporarily. Eventually, all custom signatures will need to meet the new requirements. You can check your signature and see lists of active editors whose custom signatures need to be corrected. Volunteers have been contacting editors who need to change their custom signatures. If you need to change your custom signature, then please read the help page.

Next, the team will be working on a tool for quickly and easily starting a new discussion section to a talk page. To follow the development of this new tool, please put the New Discussion Tool project page on your watchlist.

Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 18:48, 31 August 2020 (UTC)