User talk:Σ/Archive/2022/January
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Talk:La République En Marche! on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:30, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Problem with your archiving bot
Your bot User:lowercase sigmabot III archived my very much active “Request Edit” on Talk:Latham & Watkins, in effect killing it. [1]. Can you fix this? Reposting it as a fresh section isn’t fair because I will lose my place in the very long Request Edit queue. I shouldn’t have to go to the back of the line. If you can’t bring this one post live again, can you please undo the entire last archive page? FYI, your bot should account for pending Request Edit templates – I see there are some pending requests going back six months, which will presumably eventually get answered! [2] Thanks. DigitalMedia11 (talk) 01:45, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- (talk page watcher) @DigitalMedia11: The archiving settings at Talk:Latham & Watkins include the parameter
|algo=old(20d)
. This instructs the bot to archive any thread where more than 20 days has elapsed between the last post and the present moment. In this case, the last post was at 19:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC); and 20 days after that is 19:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC), so in carrying out the archiving edit at 02:28, 15 December 2021 (6 hours 44 minutes after the thread became eligible) the bot was acting correctly. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Politics, government, and law request for comment
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/39/Internet-group-chat.svg/48px-Internet-group-chat.svg.png)
Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Infobox country on a "Politics, government, and law" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
Unexpected error when checking some specific accounts with editorinteract.py
Hi, Sigma.
The editorinteract.py is very useful. Recently, when I use it to check possible sockpuppets of some accounts on zhwiki banned by WMF in zh:WP:OA2021, it crashes with 500 error[3]:
Traceback (most recent call last): File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/src/app.py", line 33, in inner return func(*a, **kw) File "/data/project/sigma/www/python/src/app.py", line 71, in editorinteract_py tpl, store = EditorInteract(params)() File "./editorinteract.py", line 30, in __call__ self.process_results(store) File "./editorinteract.py", line 166, in process_results if store.namespaces[edit[0]]: KeyError: 102
I tried to identify the problem further according to the source code on GitHub[4]. But it appears to be out of my scope since it requires access to non-public databases.
Could you please check the problem?
Thanks
虹易 (talk) 07:17, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
I fixed it. →Σσς. (Sigma) 08:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
Original research noticeboard
Old threads at WP:ORN are not getting archived by the assigned bot, User:Lowercase sigmabot III. In particular, the section Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Yahwism#Torah_appears_to_be_OR from September 5 is still at the top of the page. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 06:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Please ignore this notice, they fixed vandalism in the archive template. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:37, 11 January 2022 (UTC)