User:Zhouyu2428/Evaluate an Article
![]() | Evaluate an article
Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider: Lead sectionA good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.
ContentA good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.
Tone and BalanceWikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.
Sources and ReferencesA Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.
Organization and writing qualityThe writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.
Images and Media
Talk page discussionThe article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.
Overall impressions
Examples of good feedbackA good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. |
Which article are you evaluating?
Business ecosystem - Wikipedia
Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
My research topic is focused on business ecosystem. However, this wikipedia page does not contain a sufficient amount of information about it and i would like to add on to it. In addition, information on this topic is out of date as articles and sources cited are mostly from the 90s.
Evaluate the article
Lead Section
- The lead does include an introductory sentence and it concisely describes the topic.
- The lead does include the brief description and it is concise.
- The lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
Content
- The article's content is relevant to the topic, however, it lacks current information and examples.
Tone and Balance
- The article is neutral and there is not a biased view on the topic.
- However, there is an overrepresentation of the origin of this concept from the original source. More diverse views will help enrich the content.
Sources and References
- All sources are from academic research papers and they are reliable.
- However, more current resources addressing the topic should be added.
Organization
- There isn't any grammatical error and the sections are well organized. However, It focuses on explaining the concept a little bit too much.
Images and Media
- This article lacks image and media to help readers better understand the topic.
Overall Impression
- This article's length is too short and much more information should be added to it.