Search results
There is a page named "User:VeblenBot/C/May 2010 peer reviews" on Wikipedia
- 01/05/2010, 10:00:38: This Is It (Michael Jackson song) 02/05/2010, 10:00:10: Harry Potter 02/05/2010, 10:00:20: Manchester United F.C. 02/05/2010, 19:33:55:...13 KB (1,099 words) - 10:01, 31 May 2010
- 03/06/2010, 10:00:14: Pet Shop Boys discography 03/06/2010, 15:33:55: 1975 Australian constitutional crisis 03/06/2010, 23:34:01: Deanna C. C. Peluso...11 KB (948 words) - 03:01, 4 July 2010
- --Malkinann (talk) 22:28, 19 October 2010 (UTC) Above comments suggest that peer review would be appropriate, not an extended review here, which I note the GAN...3 KB (33,799 words) - 00:01, 2 January 2011
- separate GA reviews have already accepted the reasons for the same text appearing solely in the lead. Basement12 (T.C) 15:41, 14 May 2010 (UTC) The citizenship...3 KB (38,566 words) - 19:41, 25 November 2018
- individual editors, however noble they may be. If you want further help with your prose, I recommend WP:peer review. Geometry guy 10:43, 7 January 2011 (UTC)...3 KB (34,557 words) - 14:02, 18 April 2011
- concerns have been addressed a renomination for GA status may be appropriate, although a peer review might be best first. Jezhotwells (talk) 06:03, 8 January...2 KB (10,706 words) - 14:01, 22 June 2012
- Do you want more reviews, or more from the reviews I've already cited? J Milburn (talk) 16:57, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Both more reviews and more detail from...4 KB (26,409 words) - 21:30, 6 April 2015
- the Irving and its peers established an environment conducive to free intellectual thought. At their peak, the Irving and its peers were housed by the...51 KB (5,864 words) - 02:33, 21 August 2011
- reassement. There is no set ladder of progression. Sometimes people ask for peer reviews before going for GA, sometimes before going for FA. Sometimes articles...1 KB (34,130 words) - 12:08, 2 November 2012
- re-assesment and I'm slightly tired of getting criticized for my reviews. I take the time to do reviews and suggest improvements and all I get is crap, I don't...2 KB (29,767 words) - 07:55, 9 September 2013
- previously failed at GAN in July 2010 and had never been listed. It also appears that comments at the previous GAN and the peer review have not been addressed...3 KB (28,645 words) - 03:05, 8 January 2012
- and the reviews themselves. After all, a game play breakdown is pretty simple to verify with the primary source (the game) though the reviews did highlight...3 KB (27,920 words) - 00:30, 6 August 2014
- User:Jwanders/Old talk (section Peer review idea)to put in a bot request to do category listing in the VeblenBot style: Carl's original request is here. If you mention also that the bot may do category...86 KB (11,134 words) - 11:58, 31 March 2022
- may try and find first. AIRcorn (talk) 06:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC) Yes, the points are certainly constructive and would have been most welcome at a peer review...2 KB (22,906 words) - 17:55, 24 November 2013
- User:Jerry/EditorIndex (section C)article Peer reviews: Main peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review – exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors User:CloudNineBot – transcludes...138 bytes (33,185 words) - 04:50, 14 April 2007
- Wikipedia:WFAC redirects to User:VeblenBot/C/Wikipedia_featured_article_candidates Wikipedia:WFLC redirects to User:VeblenBot/C/Wikipedia_featured_list_candidates...76 KB (9,831 words) - 14:59, 30 April 2014
- User:Michael Z Freeman/EditorIndex (section C)article Peer reviews: Main peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review – exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors User:CloudNineBot – transcludes...75 bytes (33,167 words) - 07:00, 26 June 2020
- User:CWii/EditorIndex (section C)article Peer reviews: Main peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review – exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors User:CloudNineBot – transcludes...127 bytes (33,167 words) - 07:13, 26 June 2020
- User:Retarius/Wikimarkup Guide (section C)article Peer reviews: Main peer review: Wikipedia:Peer review – exposes articles to closer scrutiny from a broader group of editors User:CloudNineBot – transcludes...5 KB (33,892 words) - 14:36, 28 September 2019
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Peer review Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Peer review/Announce Wikipedia:WikiProject Philosophy/Peer review/Wolfgang Harich Wikipedia:WikiProject...305 KB (30,837 words) - 18:43, 23 July 2022