Search results
There is a page named "User:Neutral Good" on Wikipedia
- 59 bytes (0 words) - 19:59, 20 March 2009
- Good articles are those that have not reached the featured article standard or are unlikely to reach this high standard soon due to a variety of reasons;...6 KB (901 words) - 07:08, 9 March 2015
- User:Sine23/Alignment-revised (section Neutral Good)implying the opposite; and Neutral, meaning neither. Advanced Dungeons & Dragons (AD&D) introduced a second axis of Good, Neutral, and Evil, offering a combination...30 KB (3,766 words) - 20:47, 11 June 2022
- User:SmokeyJoe (category Neutral Good Wikipedians)Wikipedia:Category intersection User:Geo Swan/On apologies Category:Neutral Good Wikipedians Category:Wikipedians who say CfD needs more diverse participants...7 KB (630 words) - 12:50, 15 June 2024
- Stop weaseling! This whole neutral section is usually full of insidious negativity, and it needs to go. If you are not supporting you are opposing. The...9 KB (1,428 words) - 18:54, 25 February 2023
- spelling in both American and British English should be preferred. Neutral choice of words: Good example: vehicle registration plate instead of number plate...335 bytes (50 words) - 21:52, 20 January 2006
- I have been fascinated by good articles ever since I joined Wikipedia. I thought it was such an intricate process, from reviewing to nominating to (if...9 KB (998 words) - 03:40, 6 January 2021
- as an Arb. Neutral Good experience. Got a 77.55% score in the 2009 guide (average was 68.13%), with similar questions (recommended Neutral though). Score:...11 KB (1,762 words) - 04:30, 2 May 2015
- [[Wikipedia:Verifiability|Verifiability]] Wikipedia:Neutral point of view [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|Wikipedia:Neutral point of view]] Wikipedia:Please do not...2 KB (145 words) - 03:24, 4 April 2017
- collectively, the result is good if we all follow the rules on civility, neutrality and verifiability; that things end up good on average as it were. — Coren...2 KB (260 words) - 01:53, 12 June 2023
- articles. It doesn't state that contributors to Wikipedia must be neutral, which is a good thing, because if it did then none of us would be allowed to edit...3 KB (441 words) - 02:12, 3 May 2022
- --Neutral GRain Spirts (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)--Neutral GRain Spirts (talk) 17:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)Neutral grain spirit From Wikipedia...6 KB (1,038 words) - 17:01, 9 October 2010
- public nature of the arb case), there would hopefully be wide-ranging and neutral community input – sort of an RfC on steroids. If you all did not succeed...5 KB (691 words) - 09:09, 22 October 2021
- selectively using sources to back a point of view up. Not good. Verifiability and neutral point of view live aside each other; they do not override each...12 KB (1,591 words) - 20:14, 23 July 2016
- language of Pan-Hispanic consensus, rather than "good" or "bad" usage. García Izquierdo, Isabela (2006). "Neutral Spanish, Spanglish and Medical Translation:...7 KB (901 words) - 22:53, 15 July 2017
- Neutral point of views are for idiots. Some people, somewhere might have claimed that weasel words might possibly be of a negative nature. Others disagree...1 KB (75 words) - 23:35, 8 November 2008
- Support A good former arb with an impressive collection of recognized content. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk · contribs) Neutral Never heard...2 KB (367 words) - 00:52, 28 November 2010
- User:J Milburn (category WikiProject Good Articles participants)guidelines, though if any editor has a good-faith concern about a potential conflict of interest or "non-neutral" editing, I am very happy to discuss it...4 KB (363 words) - 07:19, 21 April 2024
- User:David notMD (category Wikipedia good article contributors)Symbols across top indicate articles I have raised to Good Article status and subsequent "Did You Know" postings on the main page. David notMD is my nom...6 KB (381 words) - 17:30, 7 July 2024
- Comic: JSA. Favorite Anime: Mobile Police Patlabor: The TV Series. Favorite RPG System: Dungeons & Dragons, Revised Third Edition. Alignment: Neutral Good....3 KB (192 words) - 21:35, 4 July 2007
- Like all Wikimedia Foundation projects, Wikisource intends to maintain a neutral point of view. This means that annotations added by Wikisource users should
- threatened or where aggression takes place, we cannot be and shall not be neutral. Helmut Newton · My job as a portrait photographer is to seduce, amuse
- everyone with good faith, patience, a willingness to learn, and a desire to share. Almost anyone can edit and revise any edit. Anyone who does good work is