User:NK560/Asian Americans in California/NatasaEleftheriou Peer Review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

• Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
  • User:NK560
• Link to draft you're reviewing:
  • User:NK560/Asian Americans in California

Guiding questions:

• Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
  • Yes, I would suggest adding a section to your lead that shows how you added people to the article.
• Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
  • Yes, I feel like you might be able to clarify it more
• Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
  • yes
• Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
  • it gives an overall view so no i believe it is fine
• Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
  • it is not overly detailed

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added relevant to the topic?
  • Yes it is
• Is the content added up-to-date?
  • Yes
• Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
  • Nothing missing, keep adding people and maybe add section or 2 that talks about the people overall and grouping them

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added neutral?
  • yes
• Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
  • no
• Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
  • not that i found
• Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
  • no

Guiding questions:

• Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
  • yes, just cite them and you are good to go:)
• Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
  • Just add them and you are good!
• Are the sources current?
  • they could be updated in the resource section
• Check a few links. Do they work?
  • resource #2 link doesn't work

Guiding questions:

• Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
  • Yes and yes, just add your section
• Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
  • not that i found
• Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
  • Yes, it is pretty well organized, just add some paragraphs and pictures and I think you should be ready to go!

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

• Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
  • It needs more images
• Are images well-captioned?
  • it has no images
• Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
  • there are none so yes, just be careful when adding photos that they are ok to use
• Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
  • n/a

Guiding questions:

• Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
  • Yes it has, Just keep working and I think you have already put in a ton of work so good job!
• What are the strengths of the content added?
  • You added a really notable list of people and its very long and its wonderful
• How can the content added be improved?
  • Just what you were saying with photos and maybe a section or two, photos are a really great way to update and make an article better so I would try to focus on that!