User:Mikenuggets22/Hexa(tert-butoxy)ditungsten(III)/Jpierr02 Peer Review

Peer review Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects: Lead Guiding questions: Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Content Guiding questions: Is the content added relevant to the topic? Is the content added up-to-date? Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics? Tone and Balance Guiding questions: Is the content added neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? Sources and References Guiding questions: Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.) Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Are the sources current? Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible? Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.) Check a few links. Do they work? Organization Guiding questions: Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Images and Media Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? Are images well-captioned? Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? For New Articles Only If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Overall impressions Guiding questions: Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete? What are the strengths of the content added? How can the content added be improved? Examples of good feedback A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting Additional Resources Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

Whose work are you reviewing?

Mikenuggets22

Link to draft you're reviewing

User:Mikenuggets22/Hexa(tert-butoxy)ditungsten(III)

Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

There are no short "leads". The writer started by going straight to the introduction. However, I think a short lead would be nice. It would be great to start by stating the importance and some of the reasons why people are interested in Hexa(tert-butoxy)ditungsten(III) complexes. It would be helpful to highlight what is so special about their physical and chemical properties and, if possible, connect those properties to the different reactions that this complex can have.

Introduction/Background

I thought this section to be dense as there was a lot of information provided, but didn't necessarily answer my confusion. I suggest providing more background information about the Hexa(tert-butoxy)ditungsten(III) complexes before diving into the synthesis process. It would be great to know why M. H. Chisholm and M. Extine decided to work on these types of compounds and what makes them special. Also, including a diagram would be helpful in understanding the different types of conformation the W(III) complex can have. I recommend adding two or three diagrams and spreading out the paragraph. Could you explain why the W2(O-t-Bu)6 complex can react easily with alkynes or nitrile? Additionally, it would be great to include Wikipedia links for the dimolybdenum analogue, metathesis catalytic reaction, and cetylenic carbon atom, if possible.

Reaction with Carbonyl

I believe it would be beneficial to include a reaction diagram and a picture of the complex in this section. A visual representation would be helpful. I'm curious if you could provide any information about why Carbon monoxide was chosen to react with W2(O-t-Bu)6. Does the product have any unique properties?

Reaction with alkynes

I really like this paragraph. I appreciate that you explained why W2(O-t-Bu)6 does not react with PhC≡CPh or Me3SiC≡CSiMe3. However, I would like you to be more specific about the unfavorable electronics and steric effects. It would be helpful if you could provide a Wikipedia link that explains metathesis reactions and polymerizations. Moreover, including a diagram explaining the reactions you are describing would be great. I was also wondering if the W2(O-t-Bu)6 complex with alkynes have special properties.

Reaction with nitriles

I believe it would be beneficial to include a reaction diagram and a picture of the complex in this section. A visual representation would be helpful. I was wondering, why does W₂(O-t-Bu)₆ reacts more rapidly with C≡N than C≡C bond? You also mentioned that metathesis catalyst MeC≡W(O-t-Bu)₃ reacts more rapidly with C≡C than C≡N bond, why is that. I think reasoning will be nice. I was also wondering if the W2(O-t-Bu)6 complex with nitriles have special properties.

Reaction with nitroso

I was wondering why couldn't they figure out where the missing oxygen went. I believe it would be beneficial to include a reaction diagram and a picture of the complex in this section. A visual representation would be helpful. I was also wondering if the W2(O-t-Bu)6 complex with nitroso have special properties.

Reaction with allenes

I believe it would be beneficial to include a reaction diagram and a picture of the complex in this section. A visual representation would be helpful. I was also wondering if the W2(O-t-Bu)6 complex with allenes have special properties.

Reaction with platinum-alkynyls

I think a reaction diagram would be nice and a picture of the complex in this section. A visual representation would be helpful. I was also wondering if the W2(O-t-Bu)6 complex with platinum-alkynyls have special properties.

I believe that the content is neutral. However, the page could benefit from more in-depth reasoning to support the reactions listed.

All of the sources work well. I think the writer can benefit by adding some Wikipedia link page words.

I think that the writer may benefit from including a lead to help transition to the introduction paragraph. It may also be helpful to provide more background information in the introduction, rather than diving straight into the synthesis of Hexa(tert-butoxy)ditungsten(III) complexes and its variations. As a reviewer, I believe it would be valuable to understand the significance and properties of such complexes. I believe the writer need to do more work on organizing the content. Specifically, they should have a separate section for the introduction to make it distinct. They also need a section dedicated to providing background information. Improving the heading titles to highlight each part of the page could be useful in achieving this.

I believe that the Wikipedia page could benefit from more images, specifically reaction diagrams and pictures of the complexes mentioned in the page. This would be particularly helpful for the section in the introduction where the discussion mentions, 'W(III) forms a pseudotetrahedral center and adopts a staggered, ethane-like conformation.' Including these images would make the content easier to understand.