User:KatieRob27/Capricorn Records/Benjamin Fincher Peer Review
Appearance
Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
- Whose work are you reviewing? KatieRob27
- Link to draft you're reviewing:User:KatieRob27/Capricorn Records
Lead
Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? short and to the point.
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? yes
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? no
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? yes- the foundation of southern rock
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? concise
Lead evaluation
Content
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic? yes
- Is the content added up-to-date? yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? yes- background information-unless this is just a piece from the whole article in which case it does add good information to the topic.
Content evaluation
Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral? yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? no
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? no
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? no
Tone and balance evaluation
Sources and References
Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? yes
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? yes
- Are the sources current? yes
- Check a few links. Do they work? yes
Sources and references evaluation
Organization
Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? yes
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors? no
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? yes
Organization evaluation
Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- Are images well-captioned?
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
Images and media evaluation
For New Articles Only
If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.
- Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
New Article Evaluation
Overall impressions
Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- How can the content added be improved?
Overall evaluation
A good start but needs more information on the history of the label and it's impact on the region.