User:Jpaul082/Choose an Article

Article Selection

Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Article Evaluation

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- The article's content is relevant to the topic and discusses the history/origin of this therapy, how this therapy is used in cancer treatments, and controversy that surrounds this therapy.
Is it written neutrally?
- This article appears to be written in a neutral tone and does not try to sway the audience in any particular direction.
Does each claim have a citation?
- Citations/references are used throughout the article to back up the claim made by the author.
Are the citations reliable?
- The citations appear to be reliable, coming from reputable sources and being published not too long ago. The links work as well.
Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
- In the Talk section, a name change was suggested as well as expanding upon/ updating certain sections of the article

Sources: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cancer/in-depth/adjuvant-therapy/art-20046687; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1071360/

Article Evaluation

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- The article's content is relevant to the topic, however it is lacking a lot of information pertaining to the topic.
Is it written neutrally?
- This article is neutral, it only states one fact about the topic. There is no persuasive wording used.
Does each claim have a citation?
- A citation is used for the one sentence that makes up this article.
Are the citations reliable?
- This citation does appear to be reliable, however this topic requires more content and therefore more citations.
Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
- No Wikipedians have made any contributions/suggestions in the Talk page.

Sources: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1894763-overview; https://www.breastcancer.org/treatment/surgery/lymph_node_removal/axillary_dissection

Article Evaluation

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
- The article's content is relevant to the topic and discusses the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of these tumors.
Is it written neutrally?
- This article is neutral and only presents facts relating to this topic.
Does each claim have a citation?
- Citations are used to back up the claims made in this article.
Are the citations reliable?
- These citations do appear to be reliable sources and are published in recent years. The links do work.
Check out the article's Talk page to see what other Wikipedians are already contributing. Consider posting some of your ideas to the article's Talk page, too.
- The Wikipedians on this Talk page have made comments on how this tumor/cancer should be classified.

Sources: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123852458000200; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9562/