User:Jiggyscience/Leucoagaricus gongylophorus/Bibliography
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
![]() | Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Bibliography
Edit this section to compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source.
- Growth of Leucoagaricus gongylophorus Möller (Singer) and production of key enzymes in submerged and solid-state cultures with lignocellulosic substrates [1]
- Susceptibility of the ant-cultivated fungus Leucoagaricus gongylophorus (a study attempting to control the size of colonies of ants and fungi for the preservation of farmland) [2]
- Leucoagaricus gongylophorus produces diverse enzymes for the degradation of recalcitrant plant polymers in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens(the process of breaking down biomass into food for leaf cutter ants)[3]
- Symbiont-Mediated Digestion of Plant Biomass in Fungus-Farming Insects(How the fungus digests the biomass brought to it by the ants)[4]
![]() | Examples:
|
References
- ^ Maya-Yescas, Minerva E.; Revah, Sergio; Le Borgne, Sylvie; Valenzuela, Jorge; Palacios-González, Eduardo; Terrés-Rojas, Eduardo; Vigueras-Ramírez, Gabriel (2021-04). "Growth of Leucoagaricus gongylophorus Möller (Singer) and production of key enzymes in submerged and solid-state cultures with lignocellulosic substrates". Biotechnology Letters. 43 (4): 845–854. doi:10.1007/s10529-020-03057-y. ISSN 0141-5492.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Silva, A.; Rodrigues, A.; Bacci, M.; Pagnocca, F. C.; Bueno, O. C. (2006-08). "Susceptibility of the ant-cultivated fungus Leucoagaricus gongylophorus (Agaricales: Basidiomycota) towards microfungi". Mycopathologia. 162 (2): 115–119. doi:10.1007/s11046-006-0037-6. ISSN 0301-486X.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Aylward, Frank O.; Burnum-Johnson, Kristin E.; Tringe, Susannah G.; Teiling, Clotilde; Tremmel, Daniel M.; Moeller, Joseph A.; Scott, Jarrod J.; Barry, Kerrie W.; Piehowski, Paul D.; Nicora, Carrie D.; Malfatti, Stephanie A.; Monroe, Matthew E.; Purvine, Samuel O.; Goodwin, Lynne A.; Smith, Richard D. (2013-06-15). "Leucoagaricus gongylophorus Produces Diverse Enzymes for the Degradation of Recalcitrant Plant Polymers in Leaf-Cutter Ant Fungus Gardens". Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 79 (12): 3770–3778. doi:10.1128/aem.03833-12. ISSN 0099-2240.
- ^ Li, Hongjie; Young, Soleil E.; Poulsen, Michael; Currie, Cameron R. (2021-01-07). "Symbiont-Mediated Digestion of Plant Biomass in Fungus-Farming Insects". Annual Review of Entomology. 66 (1): 297–316. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-040920-061140. ISSN 0066-4170.
Outline of proposed changes
Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
- I will add some more pictures for reference
- I well add a section on the break down process of leaves to the point were it is edible for the cultivator ants.
- A new paragraph will be added discussing how the introduction of bacteria or micro fungi can control the growth of the fungus and ant colony size.
![]() | Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |