User:Jdhale/sandbox

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

My Sandbox

Behavior

Sex allocation

Formica exsecta is a eusocial species, displaying a dominance hierarchy among its individual colony members. Amongst the narrow-headed ant species, there are two different types of colony structure: monogyny, one queen per colony, and polygyny, more than one queen per colony.[1] Usually, one of these two types is prevalent within a population. These two types of colonies differ not only in the queen’s mating system, but also in the organization of types of offspring and hierarchy system. In order for a polygynous colony to thrive, it must vary its sex allocation practices depending on the abundance of resources. Colonies produce a greater percentage of male offspring when there is restraint on resource availability, as well as when the colony has a larger number of queens.[2] The opposite scenario is also found to be true. More female offspring are produced when there is an abundance of resources, as well as when the colony has a smaller number of queens. On average, a colony’s sex ratio is estimated to be 5.8% female, or one female for every 17.2 male offspring.[3] This heavily male offspring based sex ratio displays an obvious deviation from Fisher’s theory of 1:1 sex ratio.

Colonies in which the male offspring are favored, workers tend to execute most of the female gynes. In contrast, colonies where an excess of female gynes is produced, which is more than necessary for the simple act of queen replacement, they are all accepted into the colony in order to eliminate the possibility of parasitism by unrelated queens from neighboring populations.[4]

Inbreeding

In monogynous colonies, there is found to be a significant amount of inbreeding. Inbreeding coefficients were found positive for the workers of these colonies. No inbreeding was found between mother queens. Procreation between related individuals of the colony can be further explained by the queen-male relatedness coefficient of 0.23, found by experiments from Liselotte Sundström.[1] Male offspring that were reared in an inbred colony tended to be smaller in weight. Gynes reared in inbred colony display no difference in weight compared to those in non-inbred colonies. This result reflects a trade-off between the quantity of offspring and their reproductive quality. Gynes’ reproductive success is more dependant on their weight than that of a male.[5]

Haplodiploidy

Formica exsecta, much like other insects in the order Hymenoptera, have a haplodiploid sex determination system. An unusual 0.75 relatedness coefficient between full haplodiploid sisters is one of the main contributors to the frequency of evolution of eusocial species.[6] The queen’s eggs that are fertilized grow into diploid daughters, which contain two pairs of chromosomes, whereas unfertilized eggs produce haploid males, which only contain the queen's chromosomes. The voluntary fertilization of eggs is done by the egg-laying mother. Therefore, it is ideally in the queen’s best reproductive interest to lay more eggs or increase the number of eggs that produce individual that can reproduce themselves. However, further research[7] showed that female-rich colonies emphasized the production of workers rather than gynes.

References

  1. ^ a b Sundström, Liselotte; Keller, Laurent; Chapuisat, Michel (1 July 2003). "Inbreeding and Sex-Biased Gene Flow in the Ant Formica Exsecta". Evolution. 57 (7): 1552–1561. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00363.x. PMID 12940360. S2CID 22960363.
  2. ^ West, Nicholas B. Davies, John R. Krebs, Stuart A. (2 April 2012). An introduction to behavioural ecology (4th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-1416-5.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ Brown, William D.; Keller, Laurent (7 September 2000). "Colony sex ratios vary with queen number but not relatedness asymmetry in the ant Formica exsecta". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 267 (1454): 1751–1757. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1206. PMC 1690740. PMID 12233773.
  4. ^ Brown, WD (2003 Jan). "Sex-ratio dependent execution of queens in polygynous colonies of the ant Formica exsecta". Oecologia. 134 (1): 12–7. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-1072-8. PMID 12647173. S2CID 19403070. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  5. ^ Vitikainen, Emma; Haag-Liautard, Cathy; Sundström, Liselotte (1 July 2011). "Inbreeding and Reproductive Investment in the Ant Formica Exsecta" (PDF). Evolution. 65 (7): 2026–2037. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01273.x. PMID 21729057. S2CID 15671678.
  6. ^ Foster, K.; Wenseleers, T.; Ratnieks, F. (1 February 2006). "Kin selection is the key to altruism". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 21 (2): 57–60. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.020. PMID 16701471.
  7. ^ Kümmerli, Rolf; Keller, Laurent (13 December 2006). "Reproductive specialization in multiple-queen colonies of the ant Formica exsecta". Behavioral Ecology. 18 (2): 375–383. doi:10.1093/beheco/arl088.