User:Jdfoote/Talk Archive

It is felt that the article you created at Mac Reynolds is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifiable. I have moved it to User:Jdfoote/Talk Archive, which is where users are free to write about themselves. You are at liberty to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it is likely to be nominated for deletion.

Note, however, that the purpose of a user page is to enable active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so your user page is not a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing is likely to be removed.

Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information.

I now realise that this is not you. When you tidy it up, please remember to mark Image:MacReynolds.jpg with {{db|no longer needed}}.

I get it - you put up a page for Tom McConnon and User:Tbm5982 put up a page about you - but they are still vanity. I saw your comment I don't think that I'm useless. Of course none of you are useless, dear boy. It is just that within Wikipedia's strict criteria you are non-notable. Wait till you have actually made your marks somewhere in the world. -- RHaworth 19:50, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

September Mormon Collaboration

With the help of your vote, Apostle (Mormonism) has been selected as the September Mormon collaboration. I look forward to working with you on the article. --uriah923^(talk) 19:09, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas

I have nominated List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of wedding chapels in Las Vegas. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 20:17, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Positions

	Positions
	Not sure if you are the person who usually edits the MLS Position table but the way it was being done wasn't correct. The original creator coded the table for permanent positions only, you cannot assume Portland Timbers would be in 10th in week 29 when there are teams who haven't played 29 games Tychu9 (talk) 05:25, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

RE: Positions

RE: Positions

Hey, JDFoote,

As long as you were the original poster and have your system thats fine. I just thought it was some guy who was putting their team in spaces. The way I was thinking was that the team who played the fewest games would be the one to "decide" what week MLS was in. But its your table you do what you want, sorry If I messed anything up.

PS: The only thing I don't agree on is the 1st place position you added to the LA Galaxy (the one after mine) by the time that reach that week one of the Western Teams could technically catch the LA Galaxy Tychu9 (talk) 05:51, 25 September 2011 (UTC)