User:HoangPham94/Evaluate an Article
Barberini Gospels
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.
- Barberini Gospels: Barberini Gospels
- Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.: I chose this article because it relate to what I am studying and I I want to better understand about Medieval periods.
Lead:Barberini Gospels
- Guiding questions
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic? Yes, it does.
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections? Yes, it does.
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article? No, it does not.
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed? Concise.
Lead evaluation
Content
- Guiding questions
- Is the article's content relevant to the topic? Yes, it is.
- Is the content up-to-date? Yes, it is.
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong? No, it is not.
Content evaluation
Tone and Balance
- Guiding questions
- Is the article neutral? No, it is not.
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? No, there are not.
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? No, there are not.
- Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another? No, it does not.
Tone and balance evaluation
Sources and References
- Guiding questions
- Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Yes, there are.
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic? Yes, there are.
- Are the sources current? No,they are not.
- Check a few links. Do they work? Yes, some of them are still working.
Sources and references evaluation
Organization
- Guiding questions
- Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Yes, it is.
- Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors? No, it does not! I believe.
- Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic? Yes, it is.
Organization evaluation
Images and Media
- Guiding questions
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? No, it does not.
- Are images well-captioned? NA
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations? NA
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way? NA
Images and media evaluation
Checking the talk page
- Guiding questions
- What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? NA
- How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? Rated Start-class, Low-importance/ It is a part of Middle Ages, Visual arts, Bibles, Books and Kingdoms.
- How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? They took sources from different types of information.
Talk page evaluation
Overall impressions
- Guiding questions
- What is the article's overall status? State the information and source of the content.
- What are the article's strengths? Very informative.
- How can the article be improved? More images.
- How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed? Sufficient but short of images, maybe the information about this content is not much or not widely public.
Overall evaluation
Optional activity
- Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback
with four tildes — ~~~~
- Link to feedback: