User:Go23bears/Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on social media/RiaVora Peer Review

Peer review

This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

Guiding questions

Since these are just drafts, they have not been added to the actual article and therefore not incorporated into the lead

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- Yes, it talks about the rise of social media and other online platform usage, as well as movements that gained heightened popularity during COVID-19
Is the content added up-to-date?
- Yes, it is relevant to this year
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- There is no content that doesn't belong, but more can always be said about BLM and the increased usage of social media
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
- No, but it does describe BLM, which can be considered a historically marginalized population if that counts

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
- Yes
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- The article seems to be a bit biased in favor of people using social media platforms, but it is minor issue
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- Same as above, a slight skew towards people using social media platforms
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- No

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- Every line and paragraph is cited by information, not sure if it is all considered a secondary source of information
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Yes, and they reflect unbiased sources
Are the sources current?
- Yes, they are all from 2020
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
- They do include reliable sources, there could be more from the perspective of black individuals for the BLM part, as a historically marginalized population
Check a few links. Do they work?
- Yes

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- In most parts, but it is missing commas in some sections that could use some.
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- Other than the commas, not that I could find!
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes, it reflects the use of online mediums during COVID-19

If the draft you're reviewing is a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
- There could be more sources for sections, such as BLM, but each source seems reliable
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
- As mentioned above, seems great but could use more black perspective
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
- Yes
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?
- No, it should! Especially to help with BLM section

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- Yes! Added very necessary content
What are the strengths of the content added?
- Reliable sources, well-structured
How can the content added be improved?
- Commas, Links to other articles, and more perspective sources