User:EllenCT/sandbox

This is the user sandbox of EllenCT. A user sandbox is a subpage of the user's user page. It serves as a testing spot and page development space for the user and is not an encyclopedia article. Create or edit your own sandbox here.

Other sandboxes: Main sandbox | Template sandbox

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request review of it by an experienced editor for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

Various from 1Q2020

I am not allowed to talk about Economics.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Several various examples

Talk sections to address

I am not allowed to talk about Economics.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Economic growth replace primary sources with secondary reviews, especially in edits since September 29 confidence intervals in the Suits index Quantile regression United States wealth and income over time Economy of the United States Median wealth for single women by race in re 2013 SCF spreadsheets Healthcare bankruptcy,

Talk:Tucker Carlson

Articles to edit

I am not allowed to talk about Economics.

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Economics add inequality discussion and revise sections on growth and the business cycle
Business cycle from [2]
Education in the United States re [3]
Income inequality in the United States from [4], [5], and [6] and expand "Proposed policy responses"; see also [7]
Economy of the United States and United States. See [8] and [9]
Joe Biden and political positions sub-article: get lifetime ratings for the table and more specific political position summaries.
- If you can get that one to look right, do Hilary Clinton's too. EllenCT (talk) 04:11, 6 August 2013 (UTC)
Corporate tax in the United States from [10] and [11]
- plus figure out the whole incidence mess from DSGE model alignment training[12]
Austerity and maybe consumer spending from [13] and [14]
Unemployment in the United States from [15]
Transfer mispricing which somehow doesn't link correctly to Transfer pricing#Fraud also from [16]
Capital gains tax in the United States from [17] and [18]
Universal health care etc. from [19]
- Medicare GME subsidies
Too big to fail again, from [20] and [21]
Conflict of interest, moral hazard, and perverse incentive on the IPO valuation/shakedown thing
Financial risk and Stock market from [22]
Earned Income Tax Credit from [23]
this diff on Liquidity trap
Social Security Disability Insurance from [24], [25], [26], and [27]
Bruce Bartlett, Paul O'Neill, David Stockman, Sheila Bair, and Peggy Noonan, maybe
Talk:United States federal budget#President's proposal, NPP comparison table primarily [28]

Redlinks

I am not allowed to talk about Economics.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Corporate tax incidence Rentier tax and subsidy Workweek length reduction re [29] and [30]

Former

I am not allowed to talk about Economics.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Negative interest on excess reserves Short term interest rates

News stories to think about

not sure if these are all econ

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

[31] most of which is already incorporated, along with [32] which has not been as far as I can tell
[33] has a decent graph for the US re minimum wage
[34] general policy responses to unemployment per business expenditure
[35] income tax cuts hurt employment (compare here)
[36] re sick leave
[37] on high-frequency trading etc.
[38] U.S. wealth distribution by age
[39] median wealth stats
[40] on fiscal policy and US article(s)
[41] "dutch disease"
[42] police use of lethal force in pursuit
[43] recovery outcomes
[44] hilarious social media

Proofread

I am not allowed to talk about Economics.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Labor share (units?) Economic progressivism Supply-side economics Demand-side economics

View from nowhere

Source ideas

Whitewashing

some of these are not econ

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

[45] and subsequent edits (reverted)
[46] all examples removed (reverted)
[47] absolute terms instead of relative
[48] mean distorting medians, Heritage on affluence of poor,[49] absolute instead of ppp-adjusted poverty, absolute instead of relative number of millionaires and billionaires[50]
[51] not as bad as the above, but a pretty clear attempt to spin
[52] suppression of foundational, correctional, and evidentiary sources
[53] suppression of mathematical explanation for changed hegemony view
[54] and [55] possibly as retribution for questioning other edits, at [56] and [57]
[58] not sure this reflects increased relative incidence on poor

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.