Search results

any religious meaning, I just thought it was a good way of representing WP:AGF. — TheKMantalk 17:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Neither image is wonderful; the...

those who are colourblind to read the text, among other things. A bit of WP:AGF would have gone a long way. And finally, I might suggest that you start to...

want to mislead our readers, do we?". I suggest that Humus sapiens read WP:AGF and realize that it is inappropriate to accuse others of such things. Such...

hard before making the change. [[Sam Korn]] 13:35, 20 January 2006 (UTC) On AGF: I was. I actually assumed that you had deliberately left those two templates...

articles in this navbox fail to satisfy") But never mind. Next time, could you please WP:AGF and be more polite? Pdfpdf (talk) 09:52, 5 July 2017 (UTC)...

before you go about miscrediting the user behind upon criticism of a detail of the final result, have you considered WP:AGF? As for the very hat, obviously...

cannot think of a symbol beter representing the AGF philosophy. The golden ring on the right: Civility AGF does not work if not surrounded by a level of...

romeos/sweethearts, but all editors can see it, so this should say 'notice to editors', also keeping in line with AGF. Cenarium (Talk) 03:27, 27 December 2008 (UTC)...

readily available) and make sure it contains the fact and is reliable. "AGF" (assume good faith) may be entered if hook it cited to an offline source--->...

References seem to be reliable and are used well. Spotchecks show no problems, AGF on the offline sources. Date request is fine (after approval I'll move it)...

following Eel Pie Hotel thus. Sorry I thought it was a genuine compromise WP:AGF. I see you approve from the above not putting so many railway stations right...

Yoninah (talk) 20:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC) Source – Foreign-language hook ref AGF Yoninah (talk) 20:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC) Interest – Yoninah (talk) 20:05...

Wait for other commentary from intereted editors. In the meantime read WP:AGF. Wiki libs (talk) 14:59, 29 June 2010 (UTC) I told you to check previous...

comment added by WilberforceHope (talk • contribs) 22:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC) WP:AGF. My edits are not vandalism and I'm pretty insulted that you would say they...

on an established user's page, but that is no reason to take it as an intended insult. As far as I can tell, you're shattering WP:AGF.— Dædαlus Contribs...

outside of your POV a "smear campaign." At the very least, this breaches WP:AGF and raises troubling issues of Article Ownership. Abe Froman (talk) 01:33...

I could fill this navbox with billions of links. Oh, yeah! The good ol' AGF, baby! When someone runs out of reason, he says "assume good faith", without...

users to keep their talk page in shape: the template is designed for WP:AGF. --217.184.142.47 (talk) 04:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC) {{editprotected}} The...

while ID is a subset of Creationism, Creationism is not a subset of ID? BTW, AGF works both way -- I see no such assumption on your part. Oh wait! could that...

whitespace as the reason, that was not true with my version. (Please see WP:AGF, I wasn't doing what you were suggesting). I agree with you the table looked...