Template talk:Predatory open access source list

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Reliability This template is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ReliabilityWikipedia:WikiProject ReliabilityTemplate:WikiProject ReliabilityReliability articles Academic Journals This template is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles

This edit has been flagged incorrectly as introducing a predatory journal. As best I can tell, the problem is that I added a reference with doi:10.54550/ECA2022V2S3R20 and the system is flagging it because the identifier agrees with ScopeMed (doi:10.5455). I presume this is some sort of regex error; it should be fixable by matching the string "doi:10.5455/.*" instead of "doi:10.5455.*" (or whatever). I hope this is the right place to report; the edit notice doesn't tell you where to report errors. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 13:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed, see Special:AbuseFilter/history/891/diff/prev/32275. The usual place for these reports is WP:EF/FP; MediaWiki talk pages are barely watched. (Courtesy ping Headbomb). Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 17:47, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I realized this was low-traffic, but couldn’t figure out the right place to ask. 100.36.106.199 (talk) 12:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]