Template talk:Peruvian political parties

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Peru This template is supported by WikiProject Peru. This project provides a central approach to Peru-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.PeruWikipedia:WikiProject PeruTemplate:WikiProject PeruPeru articles WikiProject Peru To-do: edit history watch purge Assess and prioritise articles (log) Check for copyvios at Special:Contributions/Priscilla D, tag as {{Db-copyvio}} where appropriate Create: Expand: new articles; top importance articles FAC / FLC: Peru national football team GAN: Merge requests: Amazonas before the Inca Empire, Chachapoyas culture Review: Shining Path, Universitario de Deportes Translate: National University of San Marcos Work on Lima, the current article improvement drive Wikify: articles needing attention Politics: Political parties This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles This template is supported by Political parties task force.

A user just added the Green Alternative Ecologist Party of Peru into the template. I didn't see the party listed on the OPNE page and the English page for it was just recently created by the same user. I also can't find a page on it on Spanish Wikipedia. I think that there is at least an implicit understanding that this template is for parties which are at least somewhat notable in Peru and run candidates. Other opinions?--Jersey Devil 21:30, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The party certainly exists, as shown by their website, but I don't think it is notable enough so far, so I agree with the temporary revert until the user explains his rationale and its article becomes more than a stub. Other parties listed are just stubs or are missing articles altogether, but they are known to be recognized by the electoral authorities and have participated in recent elections. --Gabbec 05:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I propose arranging party names in alphabetical order, though names are translated in english --Andersmusician VOTE 22:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]