Search results
There is a page named "Template talk:Peacock inline" on Wikipedia
- Inline Templates...32 bytes (0 words) - 00:38, 16 March 2022
- just remove it, so an inline template wouldn't of much use. user:Dorftrottel 09:38, 19 June 2008 (UTC) Template:Peacock_inline Here you go. Chrononem ☎...9 KB (996 words) - 02:30, 18 February 2023
- model of DNA would be much better, IMHO. Also, I added two cite and one peacock inline templates, those should be addressed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul...3 KB (296 words) - 16:18, 15 May 2022
- Inline Templates...2 KB (206 words) - 08:59, 12 May 2013
- validates against invalid spellings: "dispute" (needs "disputed"), "peacocks" (should be "peacock"), "criticism" (should be "criticisms"), etc.; validates against...32 KB (3,964 words) - 20:57, 21 March 2023
- event, which is a violation of WP:NPOV. They are the image equivalent of peacock terms, which should be avoided. Moreover, the images are not directly relevant...58 KB (8,340 words) - 14:42, 15 July 2024
- 2018 (UTC) Thanks. Just for fun, it probably looks better with all 550 inline as it's much smaller! Donama (talk) 03:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)...32 KB (858 words) - 21:19, 30 June 2024
- field; see example at Sidcot School. Please use {{coord}} with "display=inline,title". Andy Mabbett 21:27, 10 May 2007 (UTC) The changes to the template...78 KB (12,191 words) - 18:49, 27 February 2023
- template is back to an orange exclamation point for now and looks okay. The {{peacock}} icon is garish and distractingly literal, though.--Father Goose 08:22...84 KB (10,846 words) - 02:49, 28 December 2022
- Template talk:Trivia/Archive 3 (section Section/Inline)guideline across. There are also such examples of this kind of wording for the peacock and weasel templates. The only time I can see trimming down the sentences...129 KB (16,538 words) - 03:16, 19 February 2023