Template talk:Beighton Junction detail

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Trains: in UK Trains Portal This template is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles Associated projects or task forces: /  This template is supported by WikiProject UK Railways.

I suggest that the map be converted to BS format as it makes the border stand out a bit more and the titles are nicely headed. Nothing is actually changed in the actual icons when doing this. Nathan A RF (talk) 06:33, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the borders are less distinct with the {{Routemap}} template. However, this is not the proper place fcor that discussion. You should make the suggestion to change them at Template talk:Routemap. Useddenim (talk) 10:28, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

After some research, if {{routemap}} is more up to date than {{BS-map}}, should all {{BS-map}}s be updated and eliminated altogether? Nathan A RF (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If grey means that the track has been lifted (per the key), what does pink mean in the context of this particular template? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 23:19, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Track in situ, out of use. Useddenim (talk) 01:19, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since the use of colours is non-standard, shouldn't pink be included in the key as well? Otherwise the pink lines should be made red and the grey ones pink, which would conform to the standard and remove the need for a key altogether but convey less information. 87.75.117.183 (talk) 17:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]