Template talk:AmigaOS

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Amiga This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles This template is supported by WikiProject Amiga. Things you can help WikiProject Amiga with: edit history watch purge Tagging Tagging Amiga related articles into the project by adding the template {{WikiProject Computing|class=|importance=|amiga=yes|amiga-importance=}} Tagging Amiga related articles into relevant categories, for example adding [[Category:Amiga software]] Tagging Amiga related articles with a relevant Link template for easier navigation of a given topic, e. g. {{AmigaOS 4}} Articles Improving the accuracy and updating dates about events Improving the clarity and the quality of articles Articles of high-importance that needs expanding or improvements: AmigaOS versions (missing dates etc) Workbench (AmigaOS) Expanding articles Expanding Stub articles and Start articles Creating/Expanding missing articles Companies: Amiga Technologies, Haage & Partner, Eyetech Software: AmiDock, JXFS (filesystem), Hollywood (programming language), Warp3D Hardware: Phase5 accelerator boards; the 1230/1240/1260 blizzards and the PPC boards. Computers (expanding): AmigaOne SE, AmigaOne XE, AmigaOne Micro-A1, DraCo, The Access Hardware prototypes: Amiga Multimedia Convergence Computer Other: Denise (computer chip), Paula (computer chip), Copper (OCS), Alice (computer chip), Lisa (computer chip), Mediator PCI, Clock port Images Uploading legal missing Amiga related images/screenshots.

This template doesn't look that good. Moreover, it doesn't seem to follow to Wikipedia standard layout of templates. It should be fixed.

Hopefully it looks better now. -- Marko75 (talk) 23:40, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]