Talk:Zorg

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Zorg (digital photo organizer)

It looks to me as if Zorg (the digital photo organizer) is a minor product which would never get its own article per WP:CORP. If this is true, there is no need to have it on a disambiguation page either, and it gives the impression of being WP:SPAM. Could you point me to some WP:V sources about it, indicating its ilmportance and/or notability, before readding it again please? Fram 12:19, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick search:
Tokek 13:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It appears, though, that "Zorg: Recovered Reality" has only one hit, so I agree that it isn't "real" and should be removed. However I don't think "zorg" is a high traffic article so I really don't see what the fuss is about. Did you research before you made your edits? —Tokek 13:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it matters if an article is high traffic or not, the same rules should apply. I had done some research[1], but my Japanese isn't that good ;-), and I couldn't find any good sources I could comprehend (e.g. in English) about it that asserted notability. OF course, it may well be that it is reasonably well-known in Japan and not outside. I'll let it stand for now, as I am unable to judge it. I agree on the other removal you did though. Fram 13:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I added it mainly because I thought it was interesting how Zorg[2] was ripping off Picasa's[3] logo and apparently getting away with it. I don't think I was praising anyone by pointing out trademark conflict; I have no affiliation with Zorg, and nobody's getting rewards or payment, but if people don't like it I guess it can go. —Tokek 00:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]