Talk:Wooper/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 23:15, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 16:24, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Image needs alt text
  • Done. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• "as well as various merchandise." seems off
  • Let me know if this looks good. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• "identified as one of the best new designs revealed at the time for Scarlet and Violet" body doenst really support this as it appears to be the one critic. Is there any listicles that rank Paladian Wooper highly?
  • Rephrased to better reflect the Reception. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• "affected his approach to the next Pokémon franchise titles, Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire." It might be just me but the wording somewhat seems like Ruby and Sapphire are upcoming games yet to be released not that they were the next following Gold and Silver.
  • Made a minor change to wording. Hopefully this helps with clarifying. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• "Regular Wooper became readily available in downloadable content for Scarlet and Violet" could you clarify what Downloadable content is?
  • I'm not sure that kind of clarification is necessary, but I've tried to alter the wording to make it a bit more clear. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• "It appears in multiple entries in the Pokémon Mystery Dungeon series," and "It has been featured in other Mystery Dungeon releases" seems repetitive
  • Tried condensing. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• There's an excessive citations tag, could probably be cleared up by spreading out the citations or using a Multiref template.
  • This was added after the nom. Just resolved. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• "GamesRadar+ writer argued" who?
  • This is called a woopsie in the industry. Fixed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ref 11 author is listed as "pokemonofthedaychick" and not a name
  • Removed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Ref 19 needs to have its formatting fixed
  • Fixed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Ref 35 should be listed as being in Spanish, also it appears to be a camal case title
  • Where is the camel case? Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  It listed as "Hobby Consolas" while the linked wiki article and website refers to it as "HobbyConsolas" Questions? four Olliefant (she/her) 03:48, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ref 39 author is formatted wrong
  • Fixed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Ref 41 should be listed as being in Italian
  • Fixed. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Various refs should be listed as being in Japanese
  • I believe I've addressed all of them. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• There is a lot of inconsistnacy in whether the source is linked or not
  • Believe I've fixed all of them. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant: Addressed the above. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:27, 27 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@OlifanofmrTennant fixed the HobbyConsolas references Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 15:16, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]