Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
I aim to post a preliminary review within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguations: none found.
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
My apologies for the delay on this, real life issues. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Statements are well referenced to RS, no evidence of OR.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Thorough with no unnecessary trivia.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- NPOV
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Images licensed and tagged
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- An interesting article. Once again my apologies for the delay in completing the review. I have thoroughly read the article, made a few minor copy-edits and am happy to pass this as worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: