Talk:War in Afghanistan (2001–2021)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Former featured article candidateWar in Afghanistan (2001–2021) is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
In the newsOn this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 18, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
March 13, 2010WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 2, 2020.
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 7, 2004, October 7, 2005, and October 7, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article candidate
WikiProject iconUnited States: Military history / September 11 / History High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject September 11, 2001 (assessed as Top-importance).
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. history (assessed as High-importance).

Typos

The picture of the Chinook helicopter mistakenly refers to "USAF pilots." The US Air Force does not have pilots for the Chinook. They're "US Army pilots," as the citation notes.

First paragraph, last sentence "andwas" appears as one word. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.60.35.95 (talkcontribs) 21:44, 19 June 2013

Under Casualties and Losses on right hand side "but reports suggest a higher number compared to coalition forces" may read better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.91.1 (talkcontribs) 17:15, 20 March 2014

"2001: Overthrow of the Taliban" - boming should be bombing — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.183.22.30 (talkcontribs) 22:28, 9 May 2014

Under "2016-2017: Collapse of peace talks, emergence of Islamic State" the second paragraph, last sentence, there is a typo "ajd" which probably should read "and." MrToasterWaffles (talk) 00:32, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



I propose merging Aftermath of the Afghanistan War (2001–2021) into War in Afghanistan (2001–2021). Firstly the content of the article is lacking, secondly Collapse of Afghan Army is irrelevant because the Afghan army collapsed in the war and not afterwards. Parham wiki (talk) 20:09, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Opppose - it is a well-sourced article and is part of our series (Category:Aftermath of wars) that covers so-called afermath of a major war. It is also a legit article per WP:SPINOUT as the main article is already of large size and there is no reason to merge it. We shouldn't be biased here. 45.44.62.232 (talk) 08:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Do What You gotta do !! I would Name it "The Twenty Year for Nothing"!!!! 50.206.203.163 (talk) 19:56, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the afghanistan war article is way too large. I do agree that this article needs a little bit of work done on it 78.172.4.50 (talk) 07:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per above. The afghan war article is already 278k kilobytes, editors have been trying to shorten this and now you want to merge 21k more kilobytes to this? I say oppose. Overthrow-dictator (talk) 17:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Merger while being too long already?

Why the aftermath article needs to be merged into this one while this one is considered too long as is? Seaparrot876 (talk) 16:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

the results are brief enough, there doesnt need to be a see aftermath section Ali36800p (talk) 16:05, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

great britains role

all b52 bombers, who bombed afghanistan, started from the isle diego garcia, that isle is owned by british empire. the b52 boeing bombers have rolls royce engines, a british corporation.

on that time tony blair and royal family controlled british empire.

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=blair%20bush%20nato&qs=n&form=QBIR&sp=-1&lq=0&pq=blair%20bush%20nato&sc=1-15&cvid=C737845F16D14BA1880DB0A59A18BCB1&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&first=1

https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=rolls%20royce%20britain%20b52&qs=n&form=QBIR&sp=-1&lq=0&pq=rolls%20royce%20britain%20b52&sc=10-23&cvid=B3790C45D9FA493EB342268BF3E7D42F&ghsh=0&ghacc=0&first=1

bae british aerospace built the panavia tornado multi role bomber.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panavia_Tornado

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Aerospace 2001:9E8:D2F9:4100:852B:AE58:EBE4:608D (talk) 18:29, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taliban casualties

I propose to indicate the upper limit for Taliban losses: 72,000 killed [1] [2] Hikka1999 (talk) 17:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ "How many terrorists has President Obama actually 'taken out'? Probably over 30,000". the Washington post. 7 December 2015. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016. Retrieved 10 February 2016.
  2. ^ "By the numbers: US war in Afghanistan's toll in lives lost, money spent". the New York Times. 29 February 2020.