Talk:Walter v Lane

	This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

-- 11(2) CDPA 1988 has nothing to do with Walter v Lane --

It's a provision about the ownership of employee's works in the course of their employment. I'm going to take that part out.

11.— First ownership of copyright. (1) The author of a work is the first owner of any copyright in it, subject to the following provisions. (2) Where a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work [, or a film, ] 27 is made by an employee in the course of his employment, his employer is the first owner of any copyright in the work subject to any agreement to the contrary. (3) This section does not apply to Crown copyright or Parliamentary copyright (see sections 163 and 165) or to copyright which subsists by virtue of section 168 (copyright of certain international organisations). 81.132.199.147 (talk) 20:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Who was Lane? What was the title of his book? DuncanHill (talk) 15:53, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, he was John Lane (publisher) and the book was Appreciations and Addresses, Delivered by Lord Rosebery. DuncanHill (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So who was Walter? DuncanHill (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Arthur Fraser Walter. DuncanHill (talk) 16:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]