Talk:Van Morrison: No Surrender/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 21:13, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I changed the wiki-link to the Daily Express, so that it refers directly to Daily Express, it is rarely referred to as just The Express. Feel free to disagree, I don't think it is a Ga issue.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The article is adequately referenced, I assume good faith for off-line sources.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Very thorough

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral and balanced

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   And another one, if only all reviews were as easy as this. Congratulations on your writing style and mastery of the elements of writing a good artcile. Passed. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Cirt (talk) 00:20, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]