Talk:Union University

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tennessee Low‑importance Union University is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles Christianity: Baptist Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Baptist work group.

{{edit COI}}

Hi! I'm a brand-new editor, and recently made some edits to this page without being aware of Wikipedia's policy on COI, which I have read now. I absolutely want to keep Wikipedia neutral, and so I accept @ElKevbo's reversion of my edits. I've redone a handful of my prior edits but kept these restricted to typos, correcting mis-cited sources, and adding one source that I thought was helpful. I welcome others to check me on whether these edits are appropriate.

~~~~ Busy Crumb (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We’re all here to make a better article, I’m sure.

Here’s an essay about “controversy” sections: WP:CRIT.

The topic of LBGT students has received widespread, continuing coverage in major media. So it follows WP:DUE to have significant space here. We can expand on the college administration’s POV, using the existing sources. WestRiding24 (talk) 04:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This makes sense, thank you for explaining and providing those links! Busy Crumb (talk) 05:35, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, it's not the final word and everybody can continue to improve it. There is a vaguely chronological history section so there's the option of splitting out the material into the respective president's terms, for example.. I can't resist pointing out that, for eight years, the article has included the (unsourced) accomplishment of changing the college's "marketing font".[1][2] So, weight is relative but it matters how much independent sources have covered a topic. If six or more reliable sources had discussed that marketing font it'd deserve a similar treatment. Also note that, in terms of screen inches, the LGBT stuff takes up no more room (on my computer) than the immediately preceding "Greek system" section, which is solely sourced to a college webpage. WestRiding24 (talk) 08:01, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]