Talk:Unbitrium

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:  • Extended periodic table Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:  • Talk:Extended periodic table

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: redirect to Extended periodic table, 29 March 2023, see discussion. redirect to Extended periodic table, 27 February 2011, see discussion.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This redirect was accepted from this draft on 29 March 2023 by reviewer DGG (talk · contribs). Elements Low‑importance This redirect is supported by WikiProject Elements, which gives a central approach to the chemical elements and their isotopes on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing this redirect, or visit the project page for more details.ElementsWikipedia:WikiProject ElementsTemplate:WikiProject Elementschemical elements articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Chemistry Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I would like to request that this page be upgraded to match the rest of the element pages or be removed.

Ummm....I think you'll have to wait for that to happen.Vancouverguy 01:34, 24 Sep 2003 (UTC)

This should be removed, up to Ubn is fine but beyond that is far into the future and predictions. -fonzy

94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)I upgraded the page to make it look like other element pages. Check it out! 94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:15, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (it gives a lot of facts about hypothetical unbitrium) --94.36.20.252 (talk) 12:02, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are the facts sourced to reliable sources? Or are they just original research and original speculations? Double sharp (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (chemistry is interesting and people may want to know about unbitrium.) --94.36.20.252 (talk) 12:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Chemistry is certainly interesting, but nothing is known about unbitrium. Nothing solid even seems to have been predicted by reliable sources. Double sharp (talk) 14:58, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Well, it will give hypothetical info about unbitrium94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:12, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)And, properties of unbitrium are predicted by those of protactinium94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:14, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For those who wish to comment on whether this article should be a redirect to Extended periodic table there is a dicussion at WT:ELEM#Ubt recreated about this. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:36, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)I think "unbitrium" should stay94.36.22.169 (talk) 16:13, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gcchemistry (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)I've made an article "Unbitrium" in my sandbox, and I asked a reviewer to check it. If it is created, please create "Infobox unbitrium". See the disccussion at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Elements#Ubt_recreated. Check out my sandbox! By the way, I put references to external sources. Gcchemistry (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The extreme rarity of ²⁶²Lr and ⁴⁸Ca means making of ³¹⁰Ubt is nearly impossible. It would cost $25,000,000,000 to make such amount of lawrencium and it would decay before enough is created. And there would be only 0.05 picobarns of the result. That's not enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Titanic225 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no Lr+Ca then.Gcchemistry (talk) 22:38, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unbitrium, also known as element 123 or eka-protactinium Unbitrium, is the hypothetical chemical element with atomic number 123 and placeholder symbol Ubt. Unbioctium and Ubt are the temporary IUPAC name and symbol, respectively, until the element is discovered, confirmed, and a permanent name is decided upon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2000:DED1:4E00:E430:315E:A099:10B8 (talk) 20:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I'm assuming that this is content you would like to make into an article, but the subject doesn't pass WP:GNG (i.e. it is not notable). Consensus has not changed between 2012 and 2018, with the most recent discussion being at WT:WikiProject Elements/Archive 36#Notability of undiscovered elements, and nothing will change unless new sources are found (if you can, that's great!) Please refrain from further attempts, especially those that look like copy-and-paste from existing articles, without opening a discussion (e.g. on this talk page). ComplexRational (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is for now a draft at User:Double sharp/Unbitrium (despite where it's hosted, CR wrote most of it): it will probably become notable once somebody actually tries to synthesise it. Right now it is more or less notable for one event (read: study) only. Double sharp (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Elements000 (talk) 19:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)55[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. ComplexRational (talk) 20:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unbitrium used to have edit history going back to 2005, but now it has been deleted and had the history of Draft:Unbitrium moved there.

The old edit history (the one going back to 2005) needs to be preserved for attribution purposes! 123957a (talk) 09:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The same applies to Talk:Unbitrium. 123957a (talk) 09:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]