Talk:USB hardware

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Electronics High‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Technology This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Text and/or other creative content from this version of USB was copied or moved into USB hardware with [837995105 this edit]. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

The first paragraph launches into discussion of sizes (standard, mini, micro) and speeds (Low Speed, Full Speed, High Speed, SuperSpeed & SuperSpeed+). Following that is the paragrgraph explaining topology (Unlike other data buses ...) with the upstream/downstream distinction. Logically the order of the two paragraphs should be reversed; topology should be explained before connector size and speed.

The explanation of upstream/downstream orientation is there and the explanation of A/B is there but the relationship between orientation and A/B is left implicit. For any reader who doesn't already understand the subject, explicit would be better than implicit.

Comments? Any objection to improvements? Thanks, ... PeterEasthope (talk) 14:38, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@PeterEasthope: Sorry this hasn't gotten any response in three years. You certainly make valid points and have my support. Can you tell whether these issues still need to be addressed? — voidxor 23:19, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just swapped the two paragraphs as suggested earlier. Let's see whether the change is tolerated before investing effort to explain the relationship of orientation to A/B. Thanks for the interest. ... PeterEasthope (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very good, thanks! You can wait if you like, but I get the sense from the history that there's not a lot of editors here. I would suggest appending, at minimum, something like "per talk" to your edit summaries so that anybody viewing your edits can find this discussion with your detailed reasoning. — voidxor 16:51, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find anything about USB UC-E6 in the article. Are there other USB UC connectors? UC=Ultra Compact? --2A02:810A:1E40:A14:1826:696D:92DD:D906 (talk) 10:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like another nonstandard connector to me. See any of the other discussions on this talk page. — voidxor 00:20, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Cabling section is a little terse. Can anybody tell me if the cable standards (e.g. wires, twists, shielding) changed at all from USB 1.x to USB 2.0, other than the slight change of the maximum allowed length? I realize that was 23 years ago. Even if there was no real change (in other words, a pre-2000 USB version 1 cable would be within spec for 480 Mbit/s USB version 2 connections), I think that would be worth mentioning. — voidxor 18:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Throughout the article there are several statements to the tune of "USB does not allow extensions cables" (specifically at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#Connectors under the image for a non-standard extension cable and the first image in the article). However, this statement is not cited or referenced at all. Without personally going through the USB specification to see if this is true or false, the only talk about this seems to be from @Voidxor above referring to this archived discussion on the topic

It may prove beneficial to find an official source for this statement to reference, or failing that, append the good old [ citation needed ] to each mention of extension cables not being allowed. 61.69.232.98 (talk) 12:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This took less time than I'd feared. In revision 2.0 of the USB standard dated April 27,2000 (available on the USB.org Web site), section 6.4.4 "Prohibited Cable Assemblies" says explicitly that extension cables are not allowed because they can create a cable that exceeds the allowed length. --Wtshymanski (talk) 17:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. Thanks for the legwork, Wtshymanski. — voidxor 23:04, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article claims about A-to-A cables: "Existing for specific proprietary purposes, not inter-operable with USB-IF compliant equipment and possibly damaging to both devices when plugged in. [...] Other combinations of connectors are not compliant. There do exist A-to-A assemblies, referred to as cables (such as the Easy Transfer Cable); however, these have a pair of USB devices in the middle, making them more than just cables."

But the USB 3.0 standard describes a "USB 3.0 Standard-A to USB 3.0 Standard-A Cable Assembly", which works for SuperSpeed only and does not have the USB2 pins except GND (VBUS, D-, D+) connected through. (Those cables are mainly used for stuff like debugging of the operating system.)

(And those cables actually exist - for example, https://www.datapro.net/products/usb-3-0-super-speed-a-a-debugging-cable.html sells them. I've used one myself.) TheJH (talk) 00:14, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]