Talk:The Parent Trap (film series)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Box
I have removed the box at the foot. Apart from the articles for the five movies - all mentioned above - what does this add ? Most entries were red links, and the rest either link to irrelevant articles or redirect back to the movie. -- Beardo 14:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Name
Should this be "The Parent Trap Series" or "The Parent Trap series" ? -- Beardo 15:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge
It might be a good idea to completely get rid of The Twins (The Parent Trap) and create a character section on this page with bios for all four twins (Sharon and Susan from the original tetralogy and Hallie and Annie from the Lindsay Lohan remake. --82.39.136.208 13:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Indie.Bones
Requested move
The Parent Trap Series → The Parent Trap series — Move to correct capitalisation - target page is a cut and paste of source page —Beardo 02:24, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.
- Support - as nominator. The correct procedure is to move the page, in order to preserve the history. -- Beardo 02:27, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
Proposed merge of Draft:The Parent Trap (franchise) into The Parent Trap (franchise)
Any information in draft should be merged into information in article. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:29, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- The draft contains dubious generalizations and calculations based on very little information. Some editors might argue these are reasonable calculations but they are little better than original research and more importantly they don't tell readers anything useful. The draft contains excessive unnecessary formatting in some places (see MOS:BOLD, MOS:SMALLFONT) and not enough formatting in other places, many of the references are bare unformatted URLs. I don't think there is anything left in the Draft that has not already been added to the main article at this point. -- 109.76.194.75 (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2021 (UTC)