Talk:Synchronization (alternating current)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Electrical engineering Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electrical engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electrical engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electrical engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Electrical engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Electrical engineeringelectrical engineering articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a redirect from Isochronous frequency to this article but the term does not appear in the article. --Kvng (talk) 17:54, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect was applied in 2008; the above comment made in 2010. It's now 2012 and it still has not been fixed. 86.150.65.44 (talk) 13:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Synchroscope and Alternator synchronization are discussions of the same topic under different titles. Any unique content could usefully be merged here. --Wtshymanski (talk) 23:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Agree with change: On this occassion, I have to agree with the principle. Synchroscope is an orphan article in any case so its loss would not be missed. However, I believe the target article should be Alternator synchronization (sic) as 'synchronization (alternating current)' (sic) is a less specific article title and could have broader interpretation. 86.150.65.44 (talk) 13:28, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Disagree with change: While the content of Synchroscope should be merged with the present article, Synchroscope is required as an article explaining the internals and workings of a synchroscope - at the moment it only describes the use of a synchroscope, which entirely overlaps the current article. 78.32.68.244 (talk) 21:11, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]