Search results
There is a page named "Talk:Surface force" on Wikipedia
- Of course the page still needs work, it really needs the equation for force due to stress but I will leave that to somebody else. I reformatted the page...919 bytes (95 words) - 19:19, 29 January 2024
- in-making-waves-across-the-surface-force/ For photo of pin: https://www.vanguardmil.com/products/navy-breast-badge-surface-chaplain-officer-miniature...3 KB (348 words) - 06:03, 22 March 2024
- to include surface force apparatus (sfa), as it can be used to probe interactions similarly to afm, optical tweezers and biomembrane force probe (bfp)...684 bytes (85 words) - 06:23, 10 August 2024
- surface tension can't simply be explained by a "net inward force" argument, which is absurd. A net inward force would cause molecules on the surface to...90 KB (13,492 words) - 14:48, 13 March 2024
- completely independent of whether a surface generates lift. A zero-force tail is stabilizing, a zero-force force foreplane is destabilizing. What matters...89 KB (13,704 words) - 21:11, 26 January 2024
- Philippines. Originally known as Commander, Naval Surface Group Western Pacific (Commander Task Force (CTF) 73/CTF 75), its mission included command readiness...4 KB (382 words) - 15:52, 27 February 2024
- removed the info about launch dates FC edits made it seem like all the Surface devices can run Windows RT and Windows 10, this is NOT true FleetCommand...56 KB (6,590 words) - 12:21, 30 June 2024
- formation; it's a description of a particular type of naval force - surface, as opposed to sub-surface or air. The article is an anomaly in your otherwise excellent...9 KB (1,262 words) - 23:44, 3 February 2024
- as just the Thunderbird. I don't see how naming this article "Surface RT" would force us to use that term throughout the article itself. PaleAqua (talk)...53 KB (7,407 words) - 09:00, 30 January 2024
- Microsoft_Surface_2. -Abhishikt (talk) 22:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC) One option is that there could become two combined (gen 1 and gen 2) Surface Pro and...17 KB (2,346 words) - 10:37, 27 February 2024
- without the analogy, is: "The true force affecting an air parcel that is forced to move horizontally over the Earth's surface" I suppose that only a very very...16 KB (2,322 words) - 04:28, 29 February 2024
- All of the Surface articles are currently very incoherent. I propose that we standardize on a common structure. See: Talk:Microsoft Surface Pro 3#Standardize...3 KB (307 words) - 21:07, 9 February 2024
- contact angle and surface energies. Several wiki pages (such as the "Wetting" page) state that the terms "Surface Tension" and "Surface Energy" are interchangeable...3 KB (309 words) - 21:06, 9 February 2024
- these links: http://blog.surface.com/2014/05/announcing-surface-pro-3/ http://www.anandtech.com/show/8037/microsoft-surface-pro-3-hands-on-display-performance-preview...44 KB (5,621 words) - 21:07, 9 February 2024
- surface gravity of the satellite is offset by the tidal force - that is, the centre of the satellite is orbiting at the proper distance, its surface is...78 KB (11,660 words) - 00:29, 17 June 2023
- Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Commander, Naval Surface Forces Pacific. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any...7 KB (1,056 words) - 01:53, 13 February 2024
- example, friction is a manifestation of the electromagnetic force acting between atoms of two surfaces, and the Pauli exclusion principle,.. has a reference...61 KB (9,668 words) - 02:31, 13 April 2024
- (and remember I know only what I've read here): The "vertical force" from the surface layer is presumably counteracting the weight i.e. acting vertically...6 KB (770 words) - 06:55, 8 February 2024
- (talk) 02:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC) Microsoft Surface 3 → Surface 3 – Conform with the other articles in the Surface series which do not have Microsoft in the...17 KB (2,164 words) - 04:20, 17 February 2024
- it applies to surfaces with adsorbed liquid. Jatosado (talk) 02:20, 7 April 2009 (UTC) Perhaps this article should include what force is being measured...20 KB (2,894 words) - 00:32, 17 May 2024
- cases. The logic would, yes, seem to hold that the gravity at the expanded surface would be inversely proportional, because, so to speak, it is more 'spread
- gravitation,—or-] {+inertiae—or gravitation—or cohesion—or elasticity—or+} surface [-tension,—or-] {+tension—or+} capillary [-attraction,—or-] {+attraction—or+}
- Recall and use the equation for kinetic energy, Ek = ½mv2 Recall and use, the equation ∆Ep = mg∆h for potential energy changes near the Earth’s surface.