Talk:Sulcalization
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Vs. assibilation.
"Consonant sulcalization" as a process appears to overlap with assibilation. Is this supposed to cover a wider spectrum however, eg. including some cases of rhotacization? --Trɔpʏliʊm • blah 21:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Liverpool accent
I came to this article from a conversation with a friend on Facebook, who was discussing the sibilant ⟨t⟩ of a Scouse (Liverpudlian) accent, which still distinguishes a minimal pair of hit and hiss (presumably /hit̞/ and /his/). Does that contradict the claim in the first paragraph, presumably from Catford (1977), that "no language is known to contrast a grooved and non-grooved sibilant"? — OwenBlacker (Talk) 16:06, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, because the consonant in hit is a non-sibilant fricative. --Ahls23 (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
sulcalization as ᵓ
Is there precedent for this convention outside the small body of work on Tillamook? Célestine-Edelweiß (talk) 05:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Start a discussion about improving the Sulcalization page
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. You can use this page to start a discussion with others about how to improve the "Sulcalization" page.